Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MuttTheHoople
I predict that, after November 4, 2008, the "Wilder Effect" and the "Bradley Effect" will henceforth be known as "The Obama Effect". Though he was leading in a bunch of primaries, he won very few (instead winning key Caucuses where his people could intimidate others into voting for The Lord High Obamamessiah). I remember in New Hampshire, exit polling showed Obama ahead by 10, while Hillary won by 18.

The polling against Republicans seemed to be correct in 2006, but I say there'll be some HUGE surprises come November 4, 2008. At all the polling internals, McCain has more support among Republicans (usually around 90-10) than Obama has among Democrats (generally 80-20). The last two elections, registered Republicans and registered Democrats voted 50-50.

Don't forget...B. Hussein has antagonized small business owners, Hillary supporters, pro-life CAtholics (oh hell, ALL pro-lifers), while only firing up black voters (11% of the population).

Since B. Hussein doesn't have a legitimate 3rd party candidate to siphon votes from McCain.

I dislike that the MSM pretty much nominated our Presidential candidate...the only thing that saved the GOP was that talk radio nominated the Democrat Presidential candidate. McCain definitely isn't perfect, but I'd rather have an imperfect Moderate-Conservative who loves his country and wants what's best for us, rather than a stuttering, babbling idiot (when there's no teleprompters around) who's the tool of '60's radicals and 3rd World Marxists, and whose love for America is suspect.

25 posted on 10/25/2008 5:33:17 AM PDT by MuttTheHoople (Bombing Billy Ayers-the Timothy McVeigh of his generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: MuttTheHoople

I think Hillary won New Hampshire by 2 points not 18.


34 posted on 10/25/2008 5:49:33 AM PDT by MikeFrancesa.com (www.war69.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: MuttTheHoople
McCain definitely isn't perfect, but I'd rather have an imperfect Moderate-Conservative who loves his country and wants what's best for us, rather than a stuttering, babbling idiot (when there's no teleprompters around) who's the tool of '60's radicals and 3rd World Marxists, and whose love for America is suspect.

If you listen to some of Obama's earlier interviews, he doesn't stutter when he's on his real, favorite subject; The White Devil. He stutters when he's trying to construct some hallucinaton or other for the general electorate.

90 posted on 10/25/2008 9:39:36 AM PDT by Stentor (Obama is Bill Ayers' Renfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: MuttTheHoople

Nader and McKinney could siphon enough votes from Obama in some states to make it difficult for him to win them!


106 posted on 10/25/2008 11:21:01 AM PDT by mdmathis6 (I'm Mike the RN!( I often do plumbing of a different sort))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson