Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court as Obama is “NOT” qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court
For Immediate Release: - 10/25/08 - Contact Info at end.
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania 10/25/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obamas lack of qualifications to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
Berg said, “I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick’s decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.
This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?
So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.
According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.
What happened to ...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,... Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.
We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States, Berg said.
Our website obamacrimes.com now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.
Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, we the people, are heading to a Constitutional Crisis if this case is not resolved forthwith.
* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com
# # #
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
http://obamacrimes.com/index.php
Even if SCOTUS shoots it down, it should ratchet up the discussion a notch or two, and might influence undecideds. The main objective now, I think, needs to be defeating The One at the polls.
IMO, from everything I’ve read on this and other threads, Berg will get the same response from SCOTUS as he got from the judge. If they even hear it.
The good news is that it may now bring this to the attention of the electorate as the various state suits proceed and before (I pray) the challenges in the electoral college election should BHO win.
I think he needs to take it to the appeals court first. Third Circuit.
Berg:
“According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.
What happened to ...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,... Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863?”
I couldn’t have said it better.
Oh wait, I pretty much DID say it, here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2114819/posts?page=294#294
STE=Q