CNN: We ‘Botched’ Sarah Palin's Interview

Newsmax ^ | October 24, 2008 | David A. Patten

[manc]

LOL
course they botched it

the idiot admitted on his interview right at the end that they are biased and do not go after obama and Biden

the only ones who do not know the media are pathetic and have lost all credibility is actually the media

now who doesn’t get it

[wny]

they didn’t bothch anything. They got caught spewing their propaganda.

[7thson]

“We also take Drew Griffin and CNN at their word — that this mistake was not intended to mislead viewers to think a conservative magazine had trashed Gov. Palin,” he stated. “Conservatives have endured hundreds — even thousands — of examples of the media deliberately distorting our words and positions. In this case, there was not a deliberate attempt.”

This is total BS! When will we learn to start calling these people out!

[DannyTN]

"It took them 3 days to even acknowledge this pathetic ambush?"

I think I've noticed a pattern. It seems like they wont respond to criticism until after O'Reily picks it up.

[Moconservative]

It was a talking point put out by either the Obama campaign or CNN which is really the same thing.

A day earlier I saw another CNN reporter say the same thing in a discussion with an anchor and I knew then they mis-quoted what the NRO article was saying.

[dfwright]

LOL!! It’s so hard to avoid the inner planets at that speed...

[evets]

I tripped on a rock

[PLD]

Anyone that reads National Review know that that was a made up story..These commies at CNN as well as other commie networks will lie about anything that doesn't suit their cause..They should know the conservatives have more brain cells in their little finger than a Dem have in his stupid head..

I did not see this on CNN because I never watch the COmmie News Network..

[evets]

[Fred]

Has Byron York told CNNObama to go F off yet???

[Billthedrill]

I agree with your comment whole-heartedly. What "botch"? One absolutely cannot read that NR article without knowing what it meant and one absolutely cannot couch it in the terms that Griffin did without being deliberately, knowingly deceitful. There is no "botching" here. The reporter was attempting to set Palin up for an angry, inaccurate answer.

The whole campaign has been like this. I don't think the anger at the blatant and omnipresent media bias is going to fade anytime soon.

[3AngelaD]

So not only is he a devious, manipulative little crapweasel, but apparently a serial liar as well.

[Aquinasfan]

Fake but accurate.

[HenpeckedCon]

It's a good thing she has a nice keester, or she would be totally useless!

[ConfidentConservative]

Hey CNN remember the “computer glitch?” with the big X on Our
Vice President’s face???

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5554/is_200511/ai_n21865048
And you want us to believe you now?

yeah, right!

[delphirogatio]

“I don’t think the anger at the blatant and omnipresent media bias is going to fade anytime soon.”

Nope, not for me, either. None of the networks has done a “good” job of covering this spectacle of a campaign. Another poster stated in another thread that they can’t even watch Brit Hume anymore and I agree. All of the network coverage stinks to high heaven.

Griffen is just as stinky after his fauxpology as he was prior to that waste of oxygen.

[Red Badger]

iT’S A “he”................

[Wil H]

We ‘Botched’ Sarah Palin's Interview

Translation "We botched it in that we failed to get away with it".