Let me clarify what I mean to say, and amend it to conform to realistic and effective tactics: We have to YELL AT THEM AND CAUSE THEIR BOWELS TO BE DISRUPTED, without actually giving them enough to make harassment and/or any other charges stick—that is, unless push really comes to shove and there is no other way. We have to scrap the formalities and procedural niceties and go right for the close. They count the ballots, or they suffer the unending torment of legitimate wrath on our part. It is a simple and clear case of their choosing to interpret the law the way they want, and so we are on solid ground to insist that they acquiesce or be beseiged.
You didn’t need to clarify, you coffee creamer counter you : {}
I understood you perfectly the first time and anyone who took it as anything other than what you clarified could only be construed as a hateful troublemaker. Oh, hey, isn’t that who precipitated the whole problem...hateful troublemakers.
I’m not near you, but I’ll do some digging to help you.