Posted on 10/23/2008 11:59:38 AM PDT by publius1
About that wardrobe …
There are still aspects of the Republican National Committee’s shopping sprees on behalf of Gov. Sarah Palin and her family that are murky.
Some of the fashion experts consulted Wednesday, for instance, about the $150,000 in purchases that appeared on Federal Election Commission records were puzzled by where all of that money had gone, given what they had seen of Ms. Palin’s wardrobe.
***
Karlo Steel, an owner there, said he had gone through the store’s receipts for September, twice, and found no sales that matched that amount, nor any combination of sales that added up to the total. Because the store carries aggressively directional men’s wear, he caters to a small clientèle and knows most of his customers by name, as well as the history of their purchases.
(Excerpt) Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com ...
Consider also the $4,902.45 charge at Atelier New York, a high-end men’s store, presumably for Ms. Palin’s husband, Todd, the famous First Dude.
Karlo Steel, an owner there, said he had gone through the store’s receipts for September, twice, and found no sales that matched that amount, nor any combination of sales that added up to the total. Because the store carries aggressively directional men’s wear, he caters to a small clientèle and knows most of his customers by name, as well as the history of their purchases.
When The Caucus called Mr. Steel back to ask him to also check August sales just in case, Mr. Steel said he found one purchase that came close to the amount in the campaign finance reports but said that he knew who that customer was and it certainly was not Mr. Palin. Neither was it Jeff Larson, the Republican consultant who showed up in campaign finance records as the one who footed the initial bill before being reimbursed by the R.N.C.
The store carries expensive cut-up T-shirts and tricky suits from avant-garde designers, like Raf Simons, Yohji Yamamoto and Ann Demeulemeester, none of whom typically create beltway-appropriate attire.
“We have no recollection of that sale and no idea what they are talking about,” Mr. Steel said.
There was similar confusion when The Caucus spoke with Jon and Wing Witthuhn, owners of Pacifier, a high-end children’s boutique in Minneapolis, where records show two charges of $98, one at Pacifier’s downtown location and another at its store in the northeast part of the city.
Mr. Witthuhn clearly recalled one of the $98 charges because it was the night of Sept. 3, just hours before Ms. Palin’s speech at the Republican National Convention. A woman burst into his store, he recalled, saying she needed outfits for several children, including a 6-month-old boy. Mr. Witthuhn explained they did not carry clothes beyond toddler age but helped her pick out a blue-striped convertible romper by Egg Baby ($60), a matching monkey-ear hat ($32) and Trumpette baby socks ($6).
After the woman explained her shopping was related to the convention and paid with a credit card number she read off of a Blackberry, it dawned on Mr. Witthuhn that he was potentially helping to outfit one of the country’s most famous infants—Trig Palin, Ms. Palin’s youngest.
Sure enough, when Mr. Witthuhn turned on the television that night, there was Trig Palin wearing the outfit purchased at Pacifier, right down to the socks—but sans the monkey-ear hat.
But as for the other $98 charge, both Mr. Witthuhn and his wife, Wing, were stumped. After going through their receipts, Mrs. Witthuhn found another $98 purchased on Sept. 9 but it was for clothing for a 2-year-old — the Palins do not have a 2-year-old.
The purchase was a little black t-shirt featuring the Ramones, as well as a striped hoodie, a pair of pants with a tiger on it and a pair of cargo pants, all from Tea Collection.
“Sounds like somebody is using it for personal use,” Mrs. Witthuhn said.
When Republican officials were queried, they said they had no concerns about any illegitimate charges and said they considered the matter closed.
At least one mystery, however, has been solved.
The F.E.C. records showed a “Lisa L. Kine” was reimbursed for more than $2,000 in charges, including those made at Pacifier, as well as others at Macy’s, the Gap, Steinlauf & Stoller, a sewing supply store in New York, and Oshman Brothers, for “tailoring supplies.” The New York address listed traces to Lisa Kline, not Kine. Could this be the mystery stylist for Ms. Palin?
Some blogs jumped to the conclusion that this must be Lisa Kline, the owner of several trendy boutiques in Los Angeles often frequented by celebrities, including Paris Hilton and Britney Spears.
The blog, daddytypes.com, fueled the speculation by e-mailing the Witthuhns a video of Ms. Kline, and Mr. Witthuhn said he was “pretty sure it’s her! CRAZY!!!”
Mrs. Witthuhn said today that her husband was “85 percent” sure but not 100 percent.
Calls on Wednesday by The Caucus to a business and home phone number found for the R.N.C.’s Lisa Kline in New York were not returned.
But a search of business records identifies the Los Angeles Lisa Kline as Lisa W. Kline, not L.
And Kate Diamond, a spokeswoman for Lisa Kline in Los Angeles, e-mailed that she wished she could accept the publicity from the connection but, alas, “Lisa has done no shopping for the Palins.”
It’s so nice to know that the New York Slimes is doing such a thorough job investigating Obambi’s fraudulent/shady campaign donations...oh wait...Obambi’s the Democrat. Never mind.
“We investigated the amounts by going to a few stores in New York and they sure didn’t buy anything in there!
So that PROVES um... something, we don’t know... We had to write 1000 words...”
Meanwhile Biden feeds campaign cash to his family, Obama feeds campaign cash to Acorn vote fraud artists, Biden’s son becomes a millionaire selling access to his dad, and no one knows where Obama’s money is coming from.
Why doesn’t the NY Times look into Obama’s sketchy campaign contributions?
HEY! NEW YORK TIMES!! While you’re worrying about Sarah’s shoe purchases, Nobama is in up to his neck in campaign donation fraud!! WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU??!
Oh... wait.... My bad. For a minute there I thought was talking to a NEWS paper.
There is much comfort in the decline of the Times as they spiral down with the rest of the newspaper world.
YAWWWWWWWWWWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN.
NYT stock at an all time low. If they keep this up they’ll be out of business soon.
Did they find Obama’s birth certificate during that search?
This is sexist! How much does Obama pay for HIS clothes? How about his Greek columns???? Unbelievable!
If the amount, whatever it was, has been reported to the F.E.C., what exactly is the issue here?
And they wonder why they’re going down the tubes? Idiots.
S&P MAINTAINS SELL RECOMMENDATION ON SHARES OF NEW YORK TIMES
Font size: A | A | A
undefined undefined | S&P Marketscope
RELATED QUOTES
2:35 PM ET 10/23/08
Symbol Last % Chg
NYT
10.05 -5.90%
Quotes delayed at least 15 minutes
SNPMarketScopeResearchNotes2008-10-23 12:01:51.000NYTNEW YORK TIMES’A’L.Braverman-CFAS&P MAINTAINS SELL RECOMMENDATION ON SHARES OF NEW YORK TIMESNYT posts Q3 loss of $0.01 vs. EPS of $0.10, worse than our $0.05 EPS estimate. EPS variance was largely due to higher-than-forecast severance expense; we view severance costs as operational due to ongoing restructuring at NYT. A revenue decline of 8.9% was wider than our forecast, hurt by weak ad trends. Online advertising rose 10%. Newsprint expense increased despite a 20% drop in usage. We are reducing our ‘08 EPS estimate by $0.09 to $0.58 and ‘09’s by $0.10 to $0.64. We are also trimming our blended P/E- and DCF-based 12-month target price by $1 to $10.|US;NYT|34543|219915
The NYTimes....all the news that’s fit to punt.
Did you know the NYTimes stock is under $10 a share, first time ever? Won’t be long now.
This is unbelievable. The Times bias is now more obvious and overexposed as Paris Hilton.
“what exactly is the issue here?”
It sure has me scratching my head trying to figure it out. Has anybody ever before worried what a campaign has spent on clothes for its candidates?
Articles like this at least help to explain this:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2113314/posts
This is news?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.