Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eagle Eye
If you want to talk about 'effective' impact....third party votes normally have the same impact as non voters in that they do not impact the main candidates' totals at all, so their votes effectively do not exist.

That would be only true IF the person who voted third Party would not have voted for the other Parties under any circumstances.

If they would have voted for one of the other two Parties as a second choice, the 3rd Party has EFFECTIVELY elected the other candidate.

Your scenario only works if the 3rd Party voter would not have voted for either Party if the 3rd Party did not exist.

190 posted on 10/23/2008 12:59:48 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (O earth, earth, earth, hear the word of the Lord-(Jer.22:29))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: fortheDeclaration
Your scenario only works if the 3rd Party voter would not have voted for either Party if the 3rd Party did not exist.

For a statement to be true is has to be true in all cases. If it is false in any case it cannot be true.

If one does not vote then there is no effect on the totals....if one would not have ever voted for either candidate, then there is no effect on the totals...

You are trying to say that if one does not vote for McCain then one has 'in effect' voted for Obama....and since there is no change in Obama's totals there is no effect!

Folks like you accept this 'in effect' BS idea without challenge...you need to think about things a bit more before you parrot them.

193 posted on 10/23/2008 1:27:22 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson