“Deemed Admissions” are a procedural technicality in civil litigation. Admissions can be “undeemed”. And, the items admitted are only binding within the litigation itself ... they have no bearing whatsoever on other matters (including the Constitutional test for the Presidency).
H
Hemorrhage, you seem quite fond of defending 0bama’s position. What’s up with that? None of us should have any problem with requiring an applicant for the most powerful position in the world to affirmatively prove his eligibility. His secrecy is the foundation for our concern that he’s not qualified for the office. The onus is on him to prove he’s eligible to serve. This isn’t an “innocent until proven guilty” situation like in a criminal court.