Why isn't this guy under investigation?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: PajamaTruthMafia
If only Sarah jad said it, then it would be on the front page of the NYT...
2 posted on
10/21/2008 5:42:44 AM PDT by
ltc8k6
To: PajamaTruthMafia
3 posted on
10/21/2008 5:43:20 AM PDT by
tiredoflaundry
(According to "The One", the American dream ends at $ 250,000)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
We really need a “fair tax”.
4 posted on
10/21/2008 5:43:20 AM PDT by
Realism
(Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
Bawney Fwank knows some things, economics isn’t one of those.
5 posted on
10/21/2008 5:43:52 AM PDT by
Tarpon
(Barack Obama will ban all the guns he has the votes for ...)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
I think a legal defense of insanity seems plausible
6 posted on
10/21/2008 5:43:58 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
I am so proud that Congresswimp Elmer Fudd is from my state! /sarc
7 posted on
10/21/2008 5:46:56 AM PDT by
SpinyNorman
(The ACLU empowers terrorists and criminals, weakens America, and degrades our society.)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
Is the big A eating away at his brain? There are plenty of rich people to soak and pay for the low-lifes to sit on their a$$es. Plenty of small business owners to rape.
8 posted on
10/21/2008 5:48:06 AM PDT by
shankbear
(Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
Why isn't this guy under investigation? ‘they’ figured he would actually enjoy being probed.
9 posted on
10/21/2008 5:48:19 AM PDT by
Vaquero
("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
Of course it never occurs to Bawney Fwank, nor any liberal for that matter, that “the RICH” aren’t just gonna sit still and be taxed to death for “the good of the many”. They’ll do what they always do, “That which makes them wealthy” in the first place. They’ll take themselves and their wealth out of a “tax the rich” country and put themselves and their wealth where it will continue to make them more wealth, overseas. The libs never, ever take into consideration human nature. They see the world as a “static” place, constant, never changing. The pie never gets bigger.......
10 posted on
10/21/2008 5:50:25 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(My wallet is made out of depleted you-owe-mium........)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
Why isn't this guy under investigation? Likely dropped all investigations as part of a plea bargain.
11 posted on
10/21/2008 5:51:13 AM PDT by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
“Barney Frank: Plenty of rich people that we can tax”
...I think I’m leaving the country for 4-8 years.
13 posted on
10/21/2008 5:52:17 AM PDT by
albie
To: PajamaTruthMafia
Plenty of rich people that we can ROB. Wealth cannot be spread only destroyed. Idiot, evil materialists like Barney think that wealth is some static substance that they can redistribute. It is a state of being an can no more be transferred that can health. I cannot workout and diet for you no matter how much you pay me o r beg me. Gotta do it yourself.
To: PajamaTruthMafia
When they leave the country or they are no longer rich, then what?
15 posted on
10/21/2008 5:57:50 AM PDT by
listenhillary
(Should we turn Alaska or Texas into our Galt's Gulch?)
To: holdonnow
Check out this Barney Frank interview!
Plenty of rich to tax...
17 posted on
10/21/2008 5:59:35 AM PDT by
tiredoflaundry
(According to "The One", the American dream ends at $ 250,000)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
Barney Frank: Plenty of rich people that we can tax )
WOW. I agree with Baahhrnny Frank.
Lets see. How about we start with Nancy Pelosi and her husband. Then we can MOVEOn to George Soros. After that Reid. Frank himself, Kerry and his wife, and lets not forget those terrific Americans that make millions of dollars doing nothing of import like movie actors and actress and dried up singers.
No exemptions (Zero as in Obama’s accomplishments) and flat tax them.
Lets see how bad Obama and Franks really want to tax the rich....
18 posted on
10/21/2008 6:00:41 AM PDT by
SECURE AMERICA
(Vote FOR AMERICA . Vote McCain / Palin)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
And when you run out of rich, you can tax the middle-class.
20 posted on
10/21/2008 6:02:28 AM PDT by
nina0113
(If fences don't work, why does the White House have one?)
To: PajamaTruthMafia; All
This is being talked about on Glenn Beck right now.
Glenn has picked out a new word that has entered the political vocabulary: CHANGE-EL-ISM
I believe that this new word was substitution of socialism or liberalism for the word change.
26 posted on
10/21/2008 6:27:25 AM PDT by
Mr. Jazzy
(USMC- Guarding freedom around the world since 1775)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
Plenty of rich people that we can tax... Like yourself, perhaps? Wouldn't it be interesting to check his taxes and see if he pays his "fair share." His colleague Ted Kennedy has never paid his fair share.
And even if by some miracle Mr. Frank does pay his fair share, it is highly likely that he isn't willing to go beyond that even though he claims the government needs more cash. There's nothing stopping him or the rest of the Liberal elites from paying more than their fair share. They're rich. They could afford it. They choose not to pay more. If their not willing to "spread the wealth," why should we, who can't afford it, be forced to pay?
To: PajamaTruthMafia
More ‘Atlas Shrugs’ mentality.
Incredible...
31 posted on
10/21/2008 6:59:17 AM PDT by
jonno
(Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
Plenty of rich people to tax?.....Is that what this is all about, Elmer Fudd?....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson