Obama says 'yes' to gay adoption

http://current.com ^ | OCT 20, 2008 | http://current.com

[manc]

I know many people and know some homo’s but I will not give up my views and sell my self out because of knowing them

not in their bedroom is it
they are in the street the woods public toilets, they are wanting to be in front of my children with their parades, they want to teach about homos in schools

I dont care if you have friends who are homosexuals at all your heart speaks more than your mind me finks

I have been there have you?

do you have experience with adoption fostering etc?

[codercpc]

Whatever. I think that if a child has a choice to be raised in a stable home, and not be shipped through the foster care experience, then that should be done.

Many gay families have extended relatives that could mentor a child through puberty etc. Many single mothers do raise little boys with help from their families. That is not the ideal situation either, but they do it.

I do have personal experience with the foster care program also, and you were speaking with kids that were not placed, so you don't have the universal experience. How many kids do you know that were adopted by homosexuals to see if it was "that bad"? You were speaking with kids that "didn't want homosexual parents" but how do you know if they had been, even against their will, they would not have had happy lives?

[manc]

I wasn’t going to say this but I think I will as this is important

I just hope he does not mind as he looks down on us

While I was growing up in foster homes a friend of mine got adopted by a man and woman, years later they divorced because the woman decided to give sex with another woman a try

the friend of mine had to say with that woman and sometimes the other woman came round and told me how he saw them kissing etc

years later I found out he killed himself, Apparently he had told another friend he was so miserable, he would dress up as a girl but thought of himself as a lesbian as he wanted sex with a woman

So I never want that again to happen to anyone so dont give me it is their business, and libertarian views.

he should have been taken away from this woman ,as she was responsible for his death to me

[manc]

whatever???????

no its not whatever we are talking about children and their future years

ironically as you write that I wrote this

and again I know of many kids placed as ones who were not placed

I was placed for the long run later

again dont jump to conclusions about knowing about kids

[Clint N. Suhks]

Since children adopted by homosexuals practice perversion at a higher rate than the general Sodomite population, 20% compared to 3%, that alone amounts to child abuse. Obviously the influence of those who practice perversion promotes the learned behavior.

Additionally, those who practice perversion offend children at ten times the rate of the general population, 32% of all child sexual abuse is homosexual as compared to the 3% of their population, that too puts children at higher risk.

You're willing to put children in harms way to defend the honor of your Sodomite friends, that says more about you and your political motives and also that you're incapable of making a rational argument for the security of children.

[Trailerpark Badass]

Acknowledge it or not, like it or not, you've trusted queers all your life.

Certainly, and that fact is illustrative of the transformation of the homosexual political movement. It wasn't long ago when homosexuals asked for their privacy to be respected, to be allowed to conduct their lives in private (among consenting adults) as they wished. Most Americans could and did support that, even moderately devout Catholics like myself.

But that has changed. Far from wanting to be left alone, the homosexual political movement now pushes to be accepted as normal, through their perversion of marriage and the spectacle of homosexuals "raising" children. As long as I have a voice, and a vote, I will NEVER deny my conscience and "accept" homosexuality as "normal," as the equivalent of heterosexual relationships.

What about two gay husbands who adopt a baby girl

And encourage her, in her most formative and vulnerable years, to "explore" homosexuality? I would consider that to be sexual abuse of the most insidious kind.

[SweetCaroline]

*

[Trailerpark Badass]

So is there a comprehensive list, then, of what homosexuals should and should not be permitted to do?

They are not permitted to demand that I accept their perversion for anything other than what it is.

[DirtyHarryY2K]

So, I can assume you will vote Obama then because he pander to perverts that wish to adopt children? (assuming there are any unwanted children left to adopt that got past BO’s abortion mills)

[MeanMachine]

You’ve never seen THE LONGEST YARD (the original, not the POS Sandler atrocity)? My favorite film. Nothing deeper than that. As for the rest, I’m not sure your logic stands up. Surely Lesbians would be interested in the responsible sexual education of their children just like everyone else. They can’t exactly raise him as a lesbian.

[Trailerpark Badass]

Well, the thing is, if I'm reading the First Amendment correctly, they are absolutely permitted to demand whatever they want from you. Just as you have every right to laugh in their faces and go about your business as if they don't even exist.

You are, apparently, not familiar with the goings-on of our neighbor-to-the-North.

I'm pretty sure that, unless you're some big-deal, famous-type person, the average homosexual doesn't really care one way or the other about your acceptance.

Then why are they asking, through the voting process, for me, as a member of society, to sanction their perverted relationships?

You are a liar. Homosexual marriage, being allowed to adopt, is EXACTLY asking society to accept their perversion as normal. There is nothing "private" about it.

So, as you said to someone else in this thread, just because you imagine something doesn't make it so. Unless you are an adolescent, you will ultimately acknowledge that some of us have vastly more life experience than you do.

Or maybe you won't, which would be your loss.

[manc]

you can’t raise him as a lesbian

are you for real with these pro homo views on here?.

honestly are you?

read what I wrote a kid died because his mother was a homo and he was seeing this and being brought up with it in the house.
he got all confused and didn’t know who he was supposed to be and killed himself, so just cut it out with your pro homo views hey

you come across as very young and well frankly not knowing much about life but I would guess you are young anyway .

[manc]

, Typon and Mean Machine are just trolling these homosexual threads.
I would hazard a guess that they are the same person anyway but Typon joins moments after another troll was banned for doing the exact same thing and their writing style is very much the same

Mean machine and Typon end up on the same threads at the same time as well since they have just joined

[MeanMachine]

You come across as someone who’s pretty old and still doesn’t know what they’re talking about. I’ll read what you wrote if you just read more. Literally, a boy can not be raised as a lesbian. I was mostly making a joke, but if you don’t get the logic behind that, that’s just too stupid for me to handle. As for your last part, how many suicides take place in the homes of neglectful straight parents? You’re full of it. But if you think this is a pressing issue, knock yourself out. Are you for real with your anti homo inanities? Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

[MeanMachine]

I’ve been here for months. I don’t know who this other person is, but as usual another dumbass disagrees with me and naturally I have to be a troll. Is it possible I’m just pragmatic? As you’ll see there are others here with my position. I’m not the one trolling the internet about gay issues, that would be you, my friend.

[manc]

why do you come on here giving out your pro homo views?

Your not that stupid you wouldn’t know we’re here because we’re against your homo agenda

Hey jokes are supposed to be funny.

[DirtyHarryY2K]

I see you never answered my question..

No child deserves to lose their natural right to have a Father AND mother just to satisfy two selfish perverts that place their sexual proclivities higher on the priority list than the emotional/spiritual needs of children.

[DirtyHarryY2K]

*I've been here for months*

And I've been here for years.. seen many homo trolls like you zotted into oblivion, just like you will be.

Keep on posting those standard, homonazi Field manual style straw man propaganda talking points..

Ping to the Calvary!