Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sick.Humor Ad - Football Player Slam Sarah Palin to the Ground - Mock Her As She Cringes In Pain
Gateway Pundit ^ | October 19, 2008 | Gateway Pundit

Posted on 10/19/2008 11:17:26 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

More Hope and Change for America...

Mere Rhetoric discovered the Left's latest "Get Out the Vote" humor ad.

The video starts out with Sarah Palin describing her foreign policy experience as Governor of Alaska. Then big 300 pound football player Terry Tate slams her to the ground and mocks her as she cringes in pain: (attack at 1:20 of the video)

(Excerpt) Read more at gatewaypundit.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: assault; couric; hystericaldems; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 10/19/2008 11:17:27 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Beating women... it’s Democrat humor. We can’t understand it.


2 posted on 10/19/2008 11:21:32 AM PDT by SolidWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

That’s terrible!


3 posted on 10/19/2008 11:21:46 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Women need to STAY HOME - IN THE KITCHEN - Pregnant, bare foot - AND while your at it, GET ME MY DINNER...... That’s what i think Obama supporter think of women (Women are strong, but not good enough to be President)


4 posted on 10/19/2008 11:27:13 AM PDT by forYourChildrenVote4Bush (Today, July 16th I no longer donate money for Israel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mylife
That is today's Democratic Party.

He is no football player

Just plays one on ads.

5 posted on 10/19/2008 11:31:03 AM PDT by scooby321 (Cai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: forYourChildrenVote4Bush
Women need to STAY HOME - IN THE KITCHEN - Pregnant, bare foot - AND while your at it, GET ME MY DINNER...... That’s what i think Obama supporter think of women (Women are strong, but not good enough to be President)

Not even.

They just want women and men to be worker bees and drones for the leviathan state. They don't particularly care if she's in the kitchen or not . . . theough a state-run cafeteria is the ultimate goal. . . they can meet the RDA guidelines better. As a general proposition, they are not too big on pregnant, either, though it is tolerable if she is not married.
6 posted on 10/19/2008 11:32:11 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("[Gov. Sarah Palin] is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger." -- Gloria Steinem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

wonder how this will work with the Hillary people?


7 posted on 10/19/2008 11:32:34 AM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Free ThinkerNY

This is an open question to Christian Freepers: Where does the line between loving my brother and self-defense of another end?


9 posted on 10/19/2008 11:44:10 AM PDT by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood
They have it so wrong, as usual. It's the Republicans who are vicious, dangerous and mean.
10 posted on 10/19/2008 11:46:36 AM PDT by Mrs. P ("Wonder Woman wears Sarah Palin pajamas." - Blood of Tyrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

While liberals protest the just use of force and punishment by the State, and seek to feminize boys, they can revel in the unjust use of violence, even by a player in a sport which would be destroyed if conformed to liberal philosophy.


11 posted on 10/19/2008 11:46:52 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( Prv 28:2: "For the transgression of a land many...princes thereof: but by a man of understanding..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

But but but ... it’s only the Republicans advocating violence against Obama!!!


12 posted on 10/19/2008 11:46:53 AM PDT by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99

Liberals support violence towards women. It’s so funny, PING.


13 posted on 10/19/2008 11:51:55 AM PDT by RepoGirl ("I've seen things you wouldn't believe. Sea beams glittering at the Tannhauser gait.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

It’s racist to criticize this ad.

Seriously, the MSM should be outraged at this, but they aren’t.


14 posted on 10/19/2008 11:52:10 AM PDT by Rodney Dangerfield ("Obama Girl" will soon need consoling. I'll take one for the team & volunteer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

That ad made me want to throw up. I was waiting for it, but it still shocked me more than I expected. Have they caught this on the Puma forums, yet?


15 posted on 10/19/2008 11:57:28 AM PDT by conservative cat (I am voting for Sarah and against Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss_Liberty
Okay I’ll say it. Black men only feel less like a minority with white women. I guess that’s why so many of them wind up with them (white girls). It be a fact.

Bryant Gumbel?

16 posted on 10/19/2008 11:58:38 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (It's no longer the Press Van, it's a "Tanker" Truck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Add a negative comment, give it a 1 star, and flag it as containing violent conduct.


17 posted on 10/19/2008 12:08:07 PM PDT by Tidbit (Shoot low boys, they're riding Shetland Ponies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
My guess would be that this ad was conceived by a homosexual. Many of them harbor a hatred of women. And most are rabidly anti-conservative.
18 posted on 10/19/2008 12:13:11 PM PDT by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevio

Very good question, one that i myself have thought and prayed about.

What is clear is that the New Covenant, which was instituted by the death of the Testator (Heb. 9:16), disallows the church ruling over those without (no Theocracies), as well as retaliation by physical force, or the use of violence in order to defend or expand the faith. In addition to explicit precepts, the Holy Spirit provides us with no precedent by the N.T. church to so do.

(1 Cor 5:12-13) “For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within? {13} But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.”

(Mat 5:39) “But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.”

(Rom 12:19) “Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.”

(1 Pet 2:20-21) “For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? but if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God. {21} For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps:”

(2 Cor 10:3) “For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh:”

(Eph 6:12) “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”

I believe that this also disallows personal self defense, except *perhaps* where necesary to save others from an immediate threat in a non religious context. The other exception is that of the use of force, if needed, in raising children, in which the parents are the first form of government. But even discipline in the church was not by physical means except in the passive form of disfellowship, and instead pro active punishment was done by spiritual means (Acts 5; 1 Tim. 1:20).

While the Scripture expliclty sanction the just use of the sword of men to punisgh evil doers (Rm. 13:1-7; 1 Pet.2:14-16), Christians, in short, are expected to be be willing, if not seeking to be, martyrs, and in fact =confessing Jesus as Lord (Rm. 10:9) to the exclusion of Caesar radically reduced your life expectancy in the first century!

And rather than raising armies, and beginning a cycle of violence in seeking to fight their enemies on their level, it was because the early church “loved not their lives to the death” (Rv. 12:11), and “took joyfully the spoiling of your goods, knowing in yourselves that ye have in heaven a better and an enduring substance” (Heb 10:34), that the church grew exponentially, they manifested real faith, and love for enemies of a manner their adversaries did not have (unlike swords), and true seekers were drawn to.


19 posted on 10/19/2008 12:16:37 PM PDT by daniel1212 ( Prv 28:2: "For the transgression of a land many...princes thereof: but by a man of understanding..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

needs to be seen by more people bump


20 posted on 10/19/2008 12:21:04 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson