But recall God helps those who help themselves too.
If 0bama is elected recall he has already stated he won't be waiting until Jan. 20, 2009 to start setting his agenda in motion. This is the one time I believe him. His actions speak louder than his words in this regard. For now we call it Hubris before the election and I pray it is only hubris.
We need to be planning for the aftermath. Both immediate and long-term. Plan for the safety of our families and for the defense of our Constitution. And my one last thought, folks this is the election that brought to full-light the war for our country.
It is not an opening shot, nor the final battle; it is the turning point. This ideology that has infected our nation is not going to be subdued if McCain/Palin wins. It took decades of associated indoctrination to create this situation. Four years from now we will again face this battle, perhaps more ferociously.
BINGO and
BUMP
This ideology that has infected our nation is not going to be subdued if McCain/Palin wins.
Something it seems folks are forgetting. The obamination is only a puppet - a Pretty, Polished, Programmed Puppet.
Many of his puppeteers are the so-called democrats in DC. They long ago infiltrated and took over the democrat party. They are hard core Socialists.
No one is sounding the cry that we must, for once, vote straight ticket - or see reid/pelosi/barney/ et al on steroids...and if they get the 60% filibuster/veto proof majority, McCain's veto pen will be useless.
Are we going to sit back and let McCain and Sarah go to DC already hamstrung?
Beat the drums: "We want change NOW. We want a change in both Houses NOW. We want the gang that protected Fanny and Freddie OUT NOW.
Vote straight ticket.
We need to understand we didn't get here overnight. One election isn't going to change things.
We need to accept these folks are not the moonbats we'd like them to be. They are and have been highly organized and highly motivated for decades. Many of us will date that back to the 1960’s, but I would say it is much longer than that. The 1960’s were the symptoms of the ‘new generation.’ It wasn't concocted by them, but by others. Others enamored with ‘progressive pragmatism.’
My point(s) being we have let the left define conservatism, instead of us defining it. We thought the Constitution would suffice...until we met them. This battle will be fought for generations to come as it took generations to become entrenched in our culture.
They had a mandate, http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm , and they have largely succeeded.
We lack the organization. We view our Right of protest etc. as something to be disdained instead of used. How often here on FR I read responses that conservatives don't do that. Horrors we should exercise a Right that only belongs to the left! (Get it...we've given away a Right.)
Do we really need to talk about Free Speech? We let them define what is ‘free speech.’
We let them define what is fair! We all know we want rules to apply to everyone equally, but that isn't fair.
A Freeper posted last week how we define capitalism:
We conservatives prefer our fairness to be defined by everyone playing by the same rules. If some people come out better than others then it's usually a matter of who worked harder, or smarter; that's the way a ‘free’ economy works.
But liberals tend to define fairness as being in place, when the results for everyone come out the same, regardless of the effort each party puts in.
First we must agree to stop them from defining us. We must decide to become organized, not just for a day, but for generations to come. We need to set a strategy to bring back the Republic, not republican party, the Republic. Then, and only then will we begin to be ready to fight the required civic battle. I don't know if we have those kind of leaders. I honestly don't know if we know how at this point.
Palin might be one. Might.