Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RFEngineer

Your first statement is extremely reckless in light of the fact you know nothing of my background.

Further, that was not a question, it was an invitation intended to help you support your “no-win” assertion; an invitation you apparently wish to avoid.

Your second statement appears to be an attempt to change the issue. It reminds me of the liberals who are squealing that Joe the Plumber is unlicensed.

In total, your response indicates to me there is nothing to be gained by continuing this discussion.


39 posted on 10/18/2008 7:00:20 PM PDT by frog in a pot (Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: frog in a pot

“Your first statement is extremely reckless in light of the fact you know nothing of my background.”

Ok Rambo, why don’t you tell me your background? If you think our military is for nation-building, then you are completely misguided. If you think that, you may also be our commander-in-chief, but that’s another discussion.


40 posted on 10/18/2008 7:16:26 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson