Excellent article. If I didn’t already have the best tag line (taken from an observation someone made about Pope Benedict), this Baptist woman would use this one paraphrased from Bishop Chaput:
Don’t be quiet about moral wrong out of a misguided wish to be polite.
(”We need to remember that tolerance is not a Christian virtue, and it’s never an end in itself. In fact, tolerating grave evil within a society is itself a form of evil. Likewise, democratic pluralism does not mean that Catholics should be quiet in public about serious moral issues because of some misguided sense of good manners.”)
That link to “Obama and Infanticide” by George and Levin yields this, “Obama chose to defend the widest possible scope for legal abortion by building a fence around it, even if that meant permitting a child who survives an abortion to be left to die without even being afforded basic comfort care.”
Induced labor abortion methodology targets alive gestating children between 16 and 26 weeks of age, relying upon the under developed lungs of such alive children to force them into being born then leaving them to slowly suffocate unattended, alone, struggling until they succumb. THAT is what Barack Obama was protecting. That is wickedness and it was his means to empower his political capital, touting his work as 'defending Roe v Wade'.
Since you are a physician, could you perhaps tell me how murdering an alive child already separated from the woman's body is curative for her health? Obama seems to think he was protecting a woman's right to choose to have her physician treat her health concerns. How does murdering a child seaprate from he rbody treat her health?
If we didn't have a record of this man's life, we would be left to conclude that he's too stupid to be president since he has such flawed reasoning. But in fact, he's just serving wickedness as a means to empower himself. ... And catholics will vote for this demonspawn in astonishing numbers.
Thanks for the ping.