Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hocndoc
The wording is gradually coming around to the actual truth ofd Obama's Illinois legislature work. What Barack Obama opposed was ending an abortion method known as induced labor abortion. Babies born alive in such 'procedures' are not survivors of an abortion attempt, they are in the middle of bing murdered via targeted negelct.

Induced labor abortion methodology targets alive gestating children between 16 and 26 weeks of age, relying upon the under developed lungs of such alive children to force them into being born then leaving them to slowly suffocate unattended, alone, struggling until they succumb. THAT is what Barack Obama was protecting. That is wickedness and it was his means to empower his political capital, touting his work as 'defending Roe v Wade'.

Since you are a physician, could you perhaps tell me how murdering an alive child already separated from the woman's body is curative for her health? Obama seems to think he was protecting a woman's right to choose to have her physician treat her health concerns. How does murdering a child seaprate from he rbody treat her health?

If we didn't have a record of this man's life, we would be left to conclude that he's too stupid to be president since he has such flawed reasoning. But in fact, he's just serving wickedness as a means to empower himself. ... And catholics will vote for this demonspawn in astonishing numbers.

54 posted on 10/18/2008 7:58:52 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

It’s all about emotions - and what I call the “I want” ethics that are emphasized by making autonomy the primary value, over non maleficence and beneficence. “First, do no harm” is and should be the “First principle” of ethics, no matter how many “ethicists” disagree.


57 posted on 10/18/2008 12:38:39 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN; hocndoc; dsc; Diago; MaryAnne

I received an email message back from Archbishop Chaput. He needs our prayers for his success at the next Bishops’ Conference. Here was his message to me:

“Thank you for your very kind words. I think there are a lot of bishops, priests and religious like your rationalizing friends. Several of us bishops tried and failed to get a stronger message at the last USCCB meeting. I’m sure that we will keep trying. The fact that people could read our current statement and arrive at different positions shows how equivocal the message is. Keep us in your prayers.”

May the Lord give you peace.
+cjc


59 posted on 10/18/2008 12:59:50 PM PDT by diamond6 (Is SIDS preventable? www.Stopsidsnow.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson