http://www.wegotsarah.com
Send this babe out in the media every single day as a campaign spokesman.
IS IT TIME FREEPERS? ACE OF SPADES THINKS IT IS!
Re: “Vetting” the Media
—Ace
A lot of people want to know why we shouldn’t begin “vetting” the media — and by “vetting,” I do in fact mean vetting. I mean starting a fund to put detectives on them and begin outing them, one by one:
In the closet.
Hits his wife.
Messing with her editor.
Stoned out of his mind on coke half the time.
Etc.
And to reduce costs, I’m sure some budding citizen journalists-detectives would be wiling to take a night a week following these bastards around, taking pictures.
The media’s position that Joe the Plumber who merely asked a question must be “vetted” out of existence certainly supports the full-blown “vetting” of them.
After all, far more turns on the questions they ask and... refuse to ask, more importantly.
Will we do this?
I’ve had angry phases where I was within inches of proposing just this. Even starting a corporation with limited liability protections to do so.
It may be time.
But not now. There are only two weeks left. The media isn’t changing. They are in the tank for Obama; this is the full-court press. If we “got” one or two of these bastards by election day, what effect? None.
However, I have been loathe to even post such a notion in the past. It’s too ugly, too vicious.
Not anymore.
It is their own “rule” — those who ask questions that harm one’s preferred candidate must be hounded and harassed and humiliated until they are silenced.
If this is the rule they impose on everyday citizens, it’s time for everyday citizens to impose it on them.
Yes, this is where we’re headed. And while I used to greet the prospect with disgust, now I’m comfortable with it.
It is their own “rule.”
They will have to live by it, same as all of us.
Joe the Plumber was the last straw.
He was the last “freebie.”
Posted by Ace at 05:37 PM
Did Chris shout her down?
Hey, if the other side is fighting with gloves off...
How many of you have friends who are terrorists and live in the same neighborhood as Farrakhan?
Circle the wagons around Congresswoman Bachmann, she will be the next person attacked relentlessly by the news media chimps.
lol.. manning up with smart,good looking REAL women, lol..
I just watched the short clip—but I was surprised Matthews let her go with her talking points. He had a look of consternation, but he didn’t really challenge her.
bump
Both have friends who bombed the Pentagon.
We cannot elect this terrorist as president!
I think they should just hone in on the “redistribute the wealth” and the position that in a botched abortion the living baby has “no consitutional right” to life- I think does 2 points are sufficently “anti-American” where they are way out of the mainstream. Those 2 issues are winners.
If they keep on going, the media is just going to corner them into “McCarthyism.” (sp)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vbw4pdxVSOg
Wow! thank you for the post (leading to that link also).
That is one of the best performances in dealing with a left wing agenda-driven talking head that I have ever seen. I bet Matthews was having a cow over that! It was especially effective because it went on and one and he kept asking variations of the same things trying to trick her.
I laughing by the end of it wondering when Matthews was going to completely lose it. He ended just before he would have gone postal.
It’s was a terrible interview. Chrissy kept on asking pointed question after question. Of course, the questions were framed in absolutes (when did you quit beating your wife), with no way of getting around the way the questions were phrased.
The woman should have simply ignored Matthews and starting spinning her own story, instead she was always on the defensive. Or done an Ed Schultz and walked.
The result? She didn’t look good at all.
