BREAKING: SCOTUS Sides With Brunner

Fox News ^ | 10/17/08 | Fox News

[NetSurfer]

Unbelievable.

[perfect_rovian_storm]

The 6th circuit ruling was against Brunner. If they were staying out of it, they wouldn’t have reversed it.

[Norman Bates]

Give us the Ohio diagnosis now.

[goodnesswins]

"until a vote by one of these people is cast there is nothing illegal.."

YEP....they register thousands of dubious people so they can pull them out at the last minute to bring their candidate over the top....happened in Washington State during last Governor race....which the Republican had won, in TWO counts....but on the 3rd...well lookee here....we found some more ballots!

[AdvisorB]

Judge Stevens, a Gerald Ford appointee, came through in the clutch for the socialist left bent on restructuring the USA along the lines of socialist europe, if not worse.

Gerald Ford’s enduring legacy....helping to midwife the end of the Reagan Revolution. In a way, I think wherever he is, he’s happy about that...sticking it to the man (Reagan) and the party he so hated.

[perfect_rovian_storm]

fux0r3d.

[Reagan69]

There has to be more to their decision. I can’t believe all 9 would just give a green light to voter fraud.

[muggs]

I’m stunned.

[FlingWingFlyer]

Brunner’s Boy Wonder would have been out 200,000 fake votes if the ‘RATS on the SCOTUS would have sided with the GOP and America.

[careyb]

Link is Here

[Deaf Smith]

How did this get Fast-Tracked to SCOTUS? Attention Philip J. Berg; are you taking notes?

[TexasNative2000]

I said a few days ago that the Supreme Court would simply not get involved.

If they were going to not get involved, they would have not rendered a decision - they would have left the Appeals Court ruling stand.

They pro-actively made this decision.

[Norman Bates]

But they did reverse it. A 3-judge panel of the 6th circuit overruled the original Reagan appointee saying that Brunner had to comply. Then the full en banc court overturned the panel. Now SCOTUS has set a terrible, terrifying precedent.

[livius]

Full court just means they were all there, not that it was unanimous. I would bet Kennedy was the deciding vote.

[MNlurker]

I am too, but will wait for whole report.

[arichtaxpayer]

So now won’t every state file with the Supreme Court to have all of their applications to count too?

[38special]

R’uh R’oh

[ninergold3]

Makes me sick.

[weef]

Anyone have any ideas when the next civil war begins? This stuff is getting out of hand.

[LS]

How about we wait for the decision, huh?

Remember, these are SEQUESTERED. I think it's the time constraint that was the issue. Not that Brunner doesn't want to cheat, but the Court has been pretty solid on time constraints on voting issues. Remember Bush v. Gore? It was all about time.