To: NCDragon
Nice story except that Marcus Nonius Macrinus was never a gladiator.
2 posted on
10/17/2008 4:16:31 AM PDT by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
While vague, the article gets that point across.
Like the post above mine, I was also struck by how the article kept going back to the movie. It's no wonder folks have no concept of actual historical events. They rely on Hollywood to teach them all they need to know. ..gack
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Are you suggesting that historic facts are in some way relevant?
5 posted on
10/17/2008 4:45:19 AM PDT by
Tax-chick
(After 5:00 p.m., slip brains through slot in door.)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Maybe he was a gladiator organizer. That’s almost as good, right?
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Nice story except that Marcus Nonius Macrinus was never a gladiator.Gladiator was a remake of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire in which the character who was the equivalent of Russell Crowe's character never became a gladiator, but was instead sent far away to Asia as commander. I was not that familiar with the story, so did not know that the original was more historically accurate. The original movie starred Stephen Boyd, Sophia Loren, Alec Guiness, and Christopher Plummer.
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
It's to Fox's credit that they actually have quotation marks around the word gladiator.
Your larger point it correct: Hollywood and history have had a tenuous relationship at best—one whose foundations is selling tickets and enlarging the vanities of their producers while in true leftist fashion practicing distortion and deception.
one exception is this new indie coming out next year:
http://www.nicholasofmyra-movie.com/
17 posted on
10/18/2008 11:28:10 AM PDT by
eleni121
(EN TOUTO NIKA!! +)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson