Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee; cpforlife.org

OK, my most determined pro-life FRiends — your time has come! [And please ping other abortion researchers. I’ll study your responses.]

McCain cornered Obama on the live birth abortion debate, and the moderator appeared to rattle him when he had a chance for the death blow [and, based on reading the transcript] apparently cut him off. But that’s OK. Obama had no choice but to lie his way out. Here’s where your study can kick in:

MCCAIN: Senator Obama, as a member of the Illinois State Senate, voted in the Judiciary Committee against a law that would provide immediate medical attention to a child born of a failed abortion. He voted against that.

And then, on the floor of the State Senate, as he did 130 times as a state senator, he voted present.

Then there was another bill before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the state of Illinois not that long ago, where he voted against a ban on partial-birth abortion, one of the late-term abortion, a really — one of the bad procedures, a terrible. And then, on the floor of the Illinois State Senate, he voted present.

I don’t know how you vote “present” on some of that. I don’t know how you align yourself with the extreme aspect of the pro- abortion movement in America. And that’s his record, and that’s a matter of his record.

And he’ll say it has something to do with Roe v. Wade, about the Illinois State Senate. It was clear-cut votes that Senator Obama voted, I think, in direct contradiction to the feelings and views of mainstream America.

SCHIEFFER: Response?

OBAMA: Yes, let me respond to this. If it sounds incredible that I would vote to withhold lifesaving treatment from an infant, that’s because it’s not true. The — here are the facts.

There was a bill that was put forward before the Illinois Senate that said you have to provide lifesaving treatment and that would have helped to undermine Roe v. Wade. The fact is that there was already a law on the books in Illinois that required providing lifesaving treatment, which is why not only myself but pro-choice Republicans and Democrats voted against it.

And the Illinois Medical Society, the organization of doctors in Illinois, voted against it. Their Hippocratic Oath would have required them to provide care, and there was already a law in the books.

With respect to partial-birth abortion, I am completely supportive of a ban on late-term abortions, partial-birth or otherwise, as long as there’s an exception for the mother’s health and life, and this did not contain that exception.

And I attempted, as many have in the past, of including that so that it is constitutional. And that was rejected, and that’s why I voted present, because I’m willing to support a ban on late-term abortions as long as we have that exception.

The last point I want to make on the issue of abortion. This is an issue that — look, it divides us. And in some ways, it may be difficult to — to reconcile the two views.

But there surely is some common ground when both those who believe in choice and those who are opposed to abortion can come together and say, “We should try to prevent unintended pregnancies by providing appropriate education to our youth, communicating that sexuality is sacred and that they should not be engaged in cavalier activity, and providing options for adoption, and helping single mothers if they want to choose to keep the baby.”

Those are all things that we put in the Democratic platform for the first time this year, and I think that’s where we can find some common ground, because nobody’s pro-abortion. I think it’s always a tragic situation.

OBAMA: We should try to reduce these circumstances.

SCHIEFFER: Let’s give Senator McCain a short response...

MCCAIN: Just again...

SCHIEFFER: ... and then...

MCCAIN: Just again, the example of the eloquence of Senator Obama. He’s health for the mother. You know, that’s been stretched by the pro-abortion movement in America to mean almost anything.

That’s the extreme pro-abortion position, quote, “health.” But, look, Cindy and I are adoptive parents. We know what a treasure and joy it is to have an adopted child in our lives. We’ll do everything we can to improve adoption in this country.

But that does not mean that we will cease to protect the rights of the unborn. Of course, we have to come together. Of course, we have to work together, and, of course, it’s vital that we do so and help these young women who are facing such a difficult decision, with a compassion, that we’ll help them with the adoptive services, with the courage to bring that child into this world and we’ll help take care of it.

SCHIEFFER: Let’s stop there, because ... [snip.]

[Did he interrupt McCain there, I wonder?]


6,679 posted on 10/16/2008 5:28:44 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March ("Never tell me the odds!" -- Han Solo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6677 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur Wildfire! March

When I think about people who refuse to acknowledge the rights of the unborn, I think about the people who refused to acknowledge the rights of American slaves in the nineteenth century. The southern Methodists broke off from the Methodist Church because they tolerated slavery. Those preachers, teachers and congregations thought of themselves as honorable church-respecting, God loving people.

How American blacks can support abortion is mind-jarring for me.


6,683 posted on 10/16/2008 6:00:09 AM PDT by maica (Barack Obama is a Weathermen Project.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6679 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

I don’t see how in the world FoxNews could just dismiss this as mediocore. That was hardhitting and just damn powerful!


6,704 posted on 10/16/2008 7:52:37 AM PDT by beckysueb (Drill here! Drill now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6679 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson