Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interview: Glenn (Beck) Talks With The Maverick (You May Be Paying 4% of your mortgage to ACORN!)
The Glenn Beck Show ^ | October 14, 2008 - 13:08 ET | Glenn Beck

Posted on 10/15/2008 8:30:42 AM PDT by pillut48

"GLENN: In the House and the Senate, the President signed it, a bill over the summer actually gives now 4% of our mortgages. If you sign a new mortgage, 4% goes to fund ACORN. How did this happen?"

(Excerpt) Read more at glennbeck.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: bmwcyle

And he has all that time to think about his vote when he suspended his campaign.


41 posted on 10/15/2008 9:10:18 AM PDT by Terry Mross (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

in the 300 Mortgage bill this summer.

Do you have the number of the bill? I’d like to read it for myself.


42 posted on 10/15/2008 9:11:24 AM PDT by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pillut48
McCain has proved time and again that he does not give a flying crap about the Republican Party. If he did, McCain-Feingold would not have happened, he would have listened to the base on immigration and not given us the finger, and he sure as h - e - double hockey sticks wouldn't have voted to fund ACORN.

He's a "MAVERICK", meaning he sticks up for himself first, last, and always.

While his being President is infinitely preferable to Obambi, his Presidency will do absolutely zippo for the Republican Party and the conservative movement. He will appoint Supreme Court justices based on some kind of ideal of bi-partisanship and fairness, rather than his promises made to us during this campaign.

My minimalist expectation is that he will preside over an aggressive foreign policy which will protect us and our interests from terrorism, and that is all.

This sucks so bad....

43 posted on 10/15/2008 9:12:17 AM PDT by WarEagle (Can America survive a President named Hussein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newheart
George Bush's biggest failures have little to do with his policies, most of which are exactly right on. His biggest failure is his incompetence behind the bully pulpit.

Thank you. Exactly what I've been saying for years. That incompetence--manifested as not fighting back, not even getting angry, and letting the media control will all perception of his administration--has and will continue to hurt us more than any misguided policies he enacted. And McCain, sadly, is no better, possibly worse. God help us. We still have to vote for him, regardless. It'll just take a few more drinks on election day.
44 posted on 10/15/2008 9:13:38 AM PDT by According2RecentPollsAirIsGood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

How would the outcome be any different?

McCain will still do pretty much nothing and end up being the last man standing because of all the infighting.

Granted if we went back and did the primaries knowing then what we do now we’d get Ron Paul because suddenly he doesn’t sound so crazy anymore.


45 posted on 10/15/2008 9:16:12 AM PDT by Domandred (McWhathisname / Palin - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
Gee, you know how McCain is. Let's skip across the aisle and make peace. We don't need mediators; we need leaders.
46 posted on 10/15/2008 9:22:15 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: WarEagle

Actually, besides aggressive execution of WOT, the place where McCain will keep faith with conservatives will be USSC judicial appointments - he will appoint Roberts/Alito types. He knows that he cannot mess up here without having the base abandon him. That said, lower court appointments will be more liberal, consistent with ongoing horse trading with Senators.


47 posted on 10/15/2008 9:23:43 AM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: newheart

???

What’s erratic about answering the question Beck had with an answer that refers back to the same question/comment??


48 posted on 10/15/2008 9:25:14 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud Rush Conservative voting for the McCain/Palin ticket now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

Nothing is erratic about answering the question with an answer that refers back. Senator McCain has a developed a tendency (one I recognize because I do it too much myself as this parenthetical phrase demonstrates) of putting too many qualifiers, disclaimers and asides in the middle of his sentences. Sometimes he wanders back to the original point of the sentence and sometimes he doesn’t. He sounds more like Obama in that regard than the straight-talk guy from the Saddleback debate.

Here is an example:
“ I know this, that if something doesn’t turn around, and again I go back to a whole lot of aspects of our financial system but what was the fact that lit the fire was home values and home loan mortgages and that has in my view.”

That is an unmitigated train wreck of a sentence.

Or as I suggested earlier, I wouldn’t misunderestimate the possibility that the transcriber had an agenda.


49 posted on 10/15/2008 9:38:42 AM PDT by newheart (The Truth? You can't handle the Truth. But He can handle you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

I saw a GOP congresscritter on TV yesterday talking about this, I think on Glenn’s show.

It’s a fee of $420 on every mortgage that will go to ACORN and similar groups. Sounded like a pool of money from which a number of groups get funds.

Legislation written by Barney Frank.

Nobody knows a thing about this. Should be a national scandal.


50 posted on 10/15/2008 10:11:25 AM PDT by freespirited (We have met the enemy, and he is the MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
The one who understands finance and economics

Yet completely ignores them in his governmental role and does the liberal thing anyway. That one?

51 posted on 10/15/2008 10:17:11 AM PDT by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: newheart

Oh, I thought you meant the subject manner—can’t say much because I’m not a linear thinking and my grammar isn’t always the best either, even though I’m a retired teacher! LOL. :-)


52 posted on 10/15/2008 10:22:17 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud Rush Conservative voting for the McCain/Palin ticket now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

“What’s erratic about answering the question Beck had with an answer that refers back to the same question/comment??”

Right out of the communist play book, answer a question with a question!


53 posted on 10/15/2008 10:27:19 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

Yup. I’m sure the Senator means well. But then so does GWB. And yet they can be painfully hard to follow. For my money, give me Newt (another ‘retired’ teacher. :-)


54 posted on 10/15/2008 10:27:42 AM PDT by newheart (The Truth? You can't handle the Truth. But He can handle you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

I thought those slush funds were taken out of the final bill?

Anyone know for sure?


55 posted on 10/15/2008 10:44:39 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: newheart
ROFL. And yet we continue to nominate them. We nominate people who are not stupid, but they are inarticulate. George Bush's biggest failures have little to do with his policies, most of which are exactly right on. His biggest failure is his incompetence behind the bully pulpit.

Three really big issues seem to contradict your statement:

1. Illegal Aliens
2. Spending
3. Mortgage Bailout


Besides those really big boulders, you may be correct.
56 posted on 10/15/2008 10:50:16 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
Oh, so Huckabee and the Born Agains can get rid of the evil non-Christian Morman again? The one who understands finance and economics.

You mean the one who was in support of the Socialist Bailout Bill? That one?
57 posted on 10/15/2008 10:52:23 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Really? I don’t want a do over, because even though McCain leaves a lot to be desired in a candidate no one else would have picked Sarah for VP. Be glad we got her, she is going to win this election for us. BTW, I think this article is full of it.


58 posted on 10/15/2008 10:52:53 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787
Actually, besides aggressive execution of WOT, the place where McCain will keep faith with conservatives will be USSC judicial appointments - he will appoint Roberts/Alito types. He knows that he cannot mess up here without having the base abandon him. That said, lower court appointments will be more liberal, consistent with ongoing horse trading with Senators.

What about John McCain's Maverick record (including saying he got the message about Amnesty and securing the border and then turning around and telling La Raza that on day one of his administration he would be re-pushing his Comprehensive Immigration Reform again) would lead you to believe that 1. He really intends to keep his word 2. He can keep his word with an overwhelmingly Democrat Congress?

Furthermore, given his penchant for reaching across the aisle, why does anyone think he will fulfill this promise?
59 posted on 10/15/2008 10:56:30 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Duncan Hunter

Good enough place to bump this thread.


60 posted on 10/15/2008 10:59:29 AM PDT by Kevmo (I love that sound and please let that baby keep on crying. ~Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson