Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(National Disgrace): 9 in 10 Down Syndrome Babies Aborted
www.cnsnews.com ^ | October 13, 2008 | Penny Starr

Posted on 10/14/2008 10:47:27 PM PDT by Publius804

'Eugenic Abortion’: With Pre-Natal Testing, 9 in 10 Down Syndrome Babies Aborted

Monday, October 13, 2008

By Penny Starr, Senior Staff Writer

(CNSNews.com) – In 1972, a year before the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision legalized abortion on demand nationwide, virtually all children with trisomy 21, or Down syndrome, were born. Less than a decade later, with the widespread availability of pre-natal genetic testing, as many as 90 percent of women whose babies were pre-natally diagnosed with the genetic condition chose to abort the child.

The practice has been described by one physician as “eugenic abortion.”

One survey of 499 primary care physicians treating women carrying these babies, however, indicated that only 4 percent actively encourage women to bring Down syndrome babies to term.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; downssyndrome; eugenicabortion; eugenics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
This story is absolutely stomach turning.
1 posted on 10/14/2008 10:47:27 PM PDT by Publius804
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Publius804

I’m sick...this country really needs to repent.

We must get the next Supreme Court Justices!!

This election is everything.

This election means babies live or die!....My Catholic friends..can we share this statistic with your Church!

This election means babies live or die!


2 posted on 10/14/2008 10:50:09 PM PDT by Texas4ever (!WHO IS OBAMA?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

How many babies that were aborted were false positives?

There have been cases where the parents were told of the “news” and went forward with the pregnancy and had healthy children.

“if it saves ONE innocent life”. Yeah right, the left lies about such matters.


3 posted on 10/14/2008 10:52:10 PM PDT by weegee (In 2006 the Democrats took over Congress. 9% approval, $4gal gas, economy tanked. Had enuff CHANGE?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804
Appalling! Also another reason the left hates Sarah Palin. She reeks of great holiness and commitment to God and shows the joys and benefits of such a relationship and discipline.
4 posted on 10/14/2008 10:52:24 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

What you have written about is also heart wrenching.


5 posted on 10/14/2008 10:54:48 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Maybe we should stop calling them ‘pro-choice’ and start calling them ‘pro-eugenics’ and see if they can wrap their minds around that one.


6 posted on 10/14/2008 10:56:09 PM PDT by madameguinot (Liberal Ideology: Peace and Torture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

One more reason to support Sarah.


7 posted on 10/14/2008 10:56:23 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804
National holocaust.

Obama and his ilk have pushed this.

8 posted on 10/14/2008 10:57:36 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Aledo High seniors pick classmate with Down syndrome as homecoming queen

That's all I'm sayin'.

Men can cry, too. :P

9 posted on 10/14/2008 10:59:17 PM PDT by CE2949BB (McCain/Palin 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madameguinot; weegee

When you link to the article look at the comment the nitwit made at the bottom of the page.


10 posted on 10/14/2008 10:59:24 PM PDT by Publius804 (McCain-Palin '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet
It's also how the March of Dimes now “prevents” birth defects.

We need a Constitutional amendment to protect human life from the courts and from doctors who do not have the patient’s best interests at heart.

There needs to be a clarified protection against genetic discrimination in insurance and “abortion” decisions.

The right to life exists in our constitution but the only way to take it out of the hands of activist judges is to make it explicit in this regard.

11 posted on 10/14/2008 11:02:08 PM PDT by weegee (In 2006 the Democrats took over Congress. 9% approval, $4gal gas, economy tanked. Had enuff CHANGE?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Murdering God’s most innocent creations, is unthinkable to me. It is truly frightful what humans are capable of, this being one of them.


12 posted on 10/14/2008 11:02:55 PM PDT by babydubya1981 (Homeschooling Moms for McCain/Palin 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804
And the horrible thing is that many people would read that article without any negative feeling whatsoever, other than, perhaps, pity for the mother, though I doubt even that. Spoiler for book (nothing crucial):
I was reading Richard Dooling's White Man's Grave ,a novel, and in it, a group of Western Peace Corp volunteers were trying to convince the women in the African village to not participate in genital mutiliation. And the African women replied that these Western women allow doctors to take their children out of their womb and kill them, so why should we listen to them.
13 posted on 10/14/2008 11:03:18 PM PDT by Vozda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Like so many, she thinks the issue is about HER.


14 posted on 10/14/2008 11:03:40 PM PDT by madameguinot (Liberal Ideology: Peace and Torture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: madameguinot

Before the Nazis were killing Jews, they went after the Gypsies and before that the terminally and mentally ill.

The Left can deny the horrorshow they are engaging in but they cannot change the FACTS.


15 posted on 10/14/2008 11:05:27 PM PDT by weegee (In 2006 the Democrats took over Congress. 9% approval, $4gal gas, economy tanked. Had enuff CHANGE?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vozda

That African woman is a very smart women :-). She told them!!


16 posted on 10/14/2008 11:05:42 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Very, very disturbing.

If these numbers are in fact true, it means that Conservative women that are Pro Life are aborting their Downs Syndrome Babies.


17 posted on 10/14/2008 11:11:45 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madameguinot

I am absolutely convinced that this single issue, given the leftest leaning Congress and President I have ever known of, will pave the way for what I call Planned Grandparenthood. We simply cannot sustain the costs of keeping these codgers alive. They are a drain, just ask any adult child with a parent with severe health issues. Waa Waa, I can’t send my child to college and take care of Grandma too.


18 posted on 10/14/2008 11:14:08 PM PDT by Semperfiwife (Common sense is in short supply in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Publius804
I recently started a weekend job providing residential care to adults, including Downs Syndrome individuals. These people are middle-aged in their 40s-50s, unheard of 30 years ago.

Downs Syndrome individuals are truly Special People, born with a cheerfulness, and loving dispositions.

I have also worked at a hospitality establishment that employed Down Sydrome individuals, where they did a fine job in their capacity as bussers.

Why does the Endangered Species Act not apply here, if we have eliminated 90% of this species type ?

Did you know that Down Syndrome individuals DO NOT GET CANCER ?

This needs to be studied, and may benefit all of us.

19 posted on 10/14/2008 11:14:15 PM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Back when Mrs. Chan was pregnant, the sonogram people tried to talk Mrs Chan and me into getting an amnio. We told them we were not interested. “But what about your age?” one exasperated young woman at the genetic screening office asked my wife. “Your fetus has a one in 128 chance of having Down’s.”

“So what?” Mrs Chan replied.

“Well, wouldn’t you want to know? So you could do something about it?”

“’Do something’? You mean ‘get an abortion’. Sorry, not interested,” replied my wife. The sono tech looked at me pleadingly.

“I don’t care if our kid has two heads,” I told her. “If he comes out of [Mrs. Chan], we’ll love him.”

She looked at us as if we were crazy. We never did get an amnio. (And Baby Chan came out perfectly fine, thanks be to God!)


20 posted on 10/14/2008 11:15:53 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson