To: justlurking
Well, it did finish off John Edwards.
Or maybe the Democrats wanted to finish off John Edwards.
14 posted on
10/12/2008 2:42:22 PM PDT by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Jim DeMint: "If you took the name off the top, the Senate could pass the Communist Manifesto.")
To: rightwingintelligentsia
You’re right. Selective outrage.
Always when it concerns a Republican.
Maybe when it is a Dem
Definitely when it is an enemy of BHO or HRC
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Or maybe the Democrats wanted to finish off John Edwards. Yup, I think you hit the nail on the head.
However, there were two other factors that entered into it: Edwards' wife's illness, and the high probability that the 'love child' was actually his.
23 posted on
10/12/2008 2:49:42 PM PDT by
justlurking
(The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Or maybe the Democrats wanted to finish off John Edwards.
___________________________________________
IMO Edwards was thrown to the willing media wolves because it took all the headlines for at least four-six news cycles, and the obama team thinks in small time bites.
32 posted on
10/12/2008 2:57:53 PM PDT by
wtc911
("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Finished off? John Edwards was a “never started.” The only person in the world (that I know of) who ever thought he had a chance was John Edwards.
144 posted on
05/03/2010 4:23:48 PM PDT by
Cyber Liberty
(Build a man a fire; he'll be warm for a night. Set a man on fire; he'll be warm the rest of his life)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson