Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: adorno

I think the author wanted to express in very clear and un-nuanced terms the childishness of the liberal feeling-process. We have all had to deal with youngsters. Some of those circular arguments go on for days, and do nothing but frustrate us and alienate the child. Sometimes, I’m convinced there is nothing we can do to make anybody change their point of view. As Rush has said, we are going to have to drag Yosemite Sam across the finish line. We can do it by voting FOR SARAH. The alternative is incredibly frightening.


17 posted on 10/12/2008 11:53:57 AM PDT by redhead (Alaska--The only state in the Union with dirty Escalades, BMWs, Mercedes, and Jaguars...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: redhead
I think the author wanted to express in very clear and un-nuanced terms the childishness of the liberal feeling-process.

You may be right, but for our part, we don't just need to point out how wrong they are; we need to explain why they're wrong. Fighting generalities with generalities doesn't win arguments.

One of the missing ingredients to the liberal mind-set not mentioned in the article is the honesty factor. If liberals were to be honest about how wrong their arguments are, then we on the other side would've won this argument a long time ago.
20 posted on 10/12/2008 12:04:26 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson