Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lastchance
First the report includes as evidence of her violation of Alaska ethics law actions she took before she was governor.

There is relevance in some cases, in pointing out inconsistencies.

Secondly the report never does state just how she benefited or her family benefited from her actions or how her actions were actually detrimental to Wooten.

The law just requires an "effort," not any actual benefit resulting.

Note also that he DID acknowledge the frustration of not being able to find out the status of the investigation, and recommended legislation that would have helped Gov. Palin's family.

175 posted on 10/10/2008 6:54:26 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: Gondring

I understand it just requires an effort. But again that is assuming that the effort was in order to gain a supposed benefit. Which I just do not see.
To me a personal or financial benefit would be something tangible. Say a large deposit in an offshore account or someone altering a unfavorable report to make it a favorable one. “ Why yes Governor you were found in a hotel room with a crack whore but my report will say you were part of the undercover task force on drug crimes and prostitution”. You get the idea.


195 posted on 10/10/2008 7:10:31 PM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson