Posted on 10/10/2008 3:12:21 PM PDT by Amityschild
Last December, someone using the name “Test Person,” from “Some Place, UT,” made a series of contributions, the largest being $764, to Senator Barack Obama’s presidential campaign totaling $2,410.07.
Someone identifying himself as “Jockim Alberton,” from 1581 Leroy Avenue in Wilmington, Del., began giving to Mr. Obama last November, contributing $10 and $25 at a time for a total of $445 through the end of February.
The only problem? There is no Leroy Avenue in Wilmington. And Jockim Alberton, who listed his employer and occupation as “Fdsa Fdsa,” does not show up in a search of public records.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
The New York Times is actually reporting this ?
Chinese dishwashers? Gaza strip yoots? Soros shills?
I suspect this was buried on the last page of the paper.
Yeah I just saw FOX news reporting it.
Where’s the FBI on this criminal act or the Justice Department???
between this Acorn, Farrakan, Odinga, etc., they need to start throwing out new information every third day. Ayers is a good start, but not enough to bring this clown down.
People obsessed, dishonest and filled with hate as today’s Democrats, won’t hesitate to corrupt the financing and registration of elections.
The ends justify the means in their sick minds.
Chinese contributions again? Another reason to not trust a Democrat.
Per Cartman recently - They’re trying to invade the USA!
lives between "caps lock" and "g" on my keyboard.
Sounds to me like they're intentionally reporting on the smaller of the cases. The idea is to deflect criticism by implying that there may some very small, isolated cases.
The NYT knows the word is getting out, so they can help by giving the impression that the amounts are so small they don't matter. "The Republicans are making a big deal over very minor mistakes" is the message I seem to get from this article.
But even a contributor who used the name “Jgtj Jfggjjfgj,” and listed an address of “thjtrj” in “gjtjtjtjtjtjr, AP,” was able to contribute $370 in a series of $10 donations in August.
A pair of donors named “Derty West” and “Derty Poiiuy,” who listed “rewq, ME” as their addresses and “Qwertyyy” or “Qwerttyyu” as either their employer or occupation, contributed a combined $1,110 in July.
where'd you see that?
the losers are doing damage control for their evil master Obozo, just trying to minimize the dollar amounts....you will not see any mention of the 3 million that has come up from other reports.
It’s a Friday afternoon news dump.
I wonder if they got those names from ACORN?
Now...I find it VERY INTERESTING that the writers choose to use the word gibberish in their article because that is the word I chose to use back in early August for these kinds of donations. Coincidence?
From the article:
An analysis of campaign finance records by The New York Times this week found nearly 3,000 donations to Mr. Obama, the Democratic nominee, from more than a dozen people with apparently fictitious donor information. The contributions represent a tiny fraction of the record $450 million Mr. Obama has raised. But the questionable donations — some donors were listed simply with gibberish for their names — raise concerns about whether the Obama campaign is adequately vetting its unprecedented flood of donors.
And then there is Obama's Gibberish Donors ....
I found this last week and posted it on google docs. It's in the article: But even a contributor who used the name “Jgtj Jfggjjfgj,” and listed an address of “thjtrj” in “gjtjtjtjtjtjr, AP,” was able to contribute $370 in a series of $10 donations in August.
Someone named “jkbkj” made a contribution. Are these Obamaites so cocky that they figure that the can just run their fingers across a keyboard when they make a contribution?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.