Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why November 2008 Looks Like March 1936
MensNewsDaily.com ^ | October 9, 2008 | Dr. Earl Tilford

Posted on 10/09/2008 1:47:03 PM PDT by RogerFGay

Near the conclusion of Tuesday night’s second presidential “town-hall” style debate, a questioner from the audience asked each candidate what he would do if Iran attacked Israel. Both candidates gave somewhat vague replies, focusing on the traditionally close relationship between the United States and Israel. In any event, if Iran ever attacks Israel, other than through its Lebanon-based surrogate Hezbollah, it will be with nuclear-tipped missiles, in which case Israel will be obliterated before the United States can respond.

The more pertinent question for the candidates is, “What will you do if and when Israel carries out a preemptive attack on Iranian nuclear facilities?” At that point both deterrence and appeasement will have failed. ... cont.

(Excerpt) Read more at mensnewsdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Political Humor/Cartoons; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 110th; 1936; 2008; issues; march1936; mccain; november2008; obama

1 posted on 10/09/2008 1:47:04 PM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

Obama = Surrender / collaborate

McCain = Attack!!


2 posted on 10/09/2008 1:52:35 PM PDT by Islander7 (The only thing Obama has to fear is the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay
“What will you do if and when Israel carries out a preemptive attack on Iranian nuclear facilities?” "

It would be too late for us to do anything. All hell will break loose.

3 posted on 10/09/2008 2:07:10 PM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimKalb; Free the USA; EdReform; realwoman; Orangedog; Lorianne; Outlaw76; balrog666; DNA Rules; ...

ping


4 posted on 10/09/2008 2:08:21 PM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Getter Done!


5 posted on 10/09/2008 2:14:41 PM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

http://www.amazon.com/Third-World-War-August-1985/dp/0722141858/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1223587517&sr=1-1
Written over twenty years ago, this British author posited it beginning in the Straits of Hormuz and initiated by Iran.
If I’m not mistaken, “Threads”, a positively horrific film speculation on nuclear war, also had it beginning though conflict with Iran.


6 posted on 10/09/2008 2:33:26 PM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

These days are frightening. Hard to sleep at night.


7 posted on 10/09/2008 2:39:57 PM PDT by Afronaut (It's 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

At this point it is difficult to imagine Israel really doing anything to actually defend itself. They finally dumped Olmert over there but all the government is doing now is stumbling in place.It seems the only way that Israel would defend itself against Iran is if the IDF is capable of acting independently but there would be a limit on what it could accomplish that way because the US would probably cut it off from resupply and the government would oppose it.


8 posted on 10/09/2008 3:18:39 PM PDT by arthurus (Old age and guile beats youth and enthusiasm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

The IDF will act to defend Israel regardless of who the PM is. And if Iran launches a nuclear attack on Israel the IDF will respond in kind regardless of what the PM has to say about it.


9 posted on 10/09/2008 3:53:24 PM PDT by PeterFinn (Buraq HUSSEIN Obama. If the libs don't like his name then why support him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

I hope so.


10 posted on 10/09/2008 4:04:27 PM PDT by arthurus (Old age and guile beats youth and enthusiasm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

btt


11 posted on 10/09/2008 4:40:20 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
The author suggests that the US would have to commit forces to degrade and hobble Iranian capacity to counterattack. This would not necesarily mean all out ground war.

The military of 2008 Iran, like 1936 Germany, is a nascent threat but hardly fully formed. Germany could in fact have been repelled from the Rhineland if France had taken decisive action. Iran could be suppressed militarily if te US chose to take decisive action.

Remember we are talking pre-nuclear Iran here. The "end of the world as we know it" would not be at stake.

12 posted on 10/09/2008 5:04:24 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson