David Brooks: Sarah Palin “represents a fatal cancer” to GOP

Southern Appeal ^ | 10/8/08 | staff

[pissant]

Wow. And here I thought limp-wristed pantywaists like David Brooks were the problem with the GOP

[ken21]

whatta pos!

[Ingtar]

I guess people that believe she is better than the average GOP fare should be looking for another party.

[Porterville]

Brooks is a jackass without a pasture.

[pissant]

http://falconparty.com/

[anniegetyourgun]

Already posted....and I can’t read this trash again.

[Grunthor]

[Sarah Palin] represents a fatal cancer to the Republican party.”

Given what that party has come to represent, I fail to see the problem here.

[Cicero]

Yeah. I think I read Reinhold Niebuhr while I was in college. Fortunately, I cannot remember a thing he said.

[jrooney]

David Brooks is a Cancer to common sense. It is folks like David Brooks and Peggy Noonan that should be taken out to pasture and if they will not willingly go, they should be dragged there.

[Jolla]

I was not aware he was ever a conservative, I once thought his analysis was okay but he is totally in O’s corner now and all thoughts of a balanced analysis has been thrown out the window. Interesting that on the NewsHour that before had David Gergan vs Mark Shields and now Brooks and Shields both those that were suppose to be giving the Republican point of view are very much anti Republican.

[FlingWingFlyer]

Who the hell is David Brooks?

[pissant]

Well, I just searched for the title again and only got this thread I posted.

[frankiep]

Barack Obama represents a fatal cancer to the USA.

[pissant]

I gotta agree with you there.

[South40]

Sarah Palin “represents a fatal cancer” to GOP

No, that would be GWB and all other members of the Kennedy wing of the GOP.

[Bryan24]

Sarah Palin is the ONLY reason I will be casting a vote for McCain.

McCain and the left-loving liberal RINOs are the cancer in the GOP.

[cookcounty]

The New York Times is a fatal cancer in the body of journalism. What a herd of punch-pullers.

[Numbers Guy]

Brooks always has been a weasel, dating back to his early days with National Review. It’s just that, like everyone else, we’re more forgiving of weasels when they say things we like.

The guy wrote a book years ago about “bourgeois bohemians”, trying to come up with a neat little name for them (”bobo”). Unfortunately for Brooks, the term has since been superseded by the epithet “metrosexual”.

And that’s the best way to describe Brooks, an elitist twerp who has been desperately looking for a fellow metrosexual to worship. The majority of his columns on Obama this year have been as breathless as any coming from the MSM usual suspects. If McCain had selected someone other than Palin, Brooks would still be finding an excuse to question the pick.

[fieldmarshaldj]