David Brooks: Sarah Palin “represents a fatal cancer” to GOP

Southern Appeal ^ | 10/8/08 | staff

[bayliving]

Bla Bla Bla Bla Bla.....

David Brooks is just upset that Sarah Palin is prettier than he is.

[BusterBear]

David Brooks is brown-nosing. Maybe he’s after a job as a speech writer in an Obama administration.

[anniegetyourgun]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2100839/posts

[Thomas W.]

Palin is indeed a fatal cancer to the inside-the-beltway, cocktail-party, country-club GOP that thinks it’s just so grubby to defend yourself against the lies and insanity of the Democrats.

I’ve figured it out, though. Krauthammer and Co. go to parties with their lib friends, who turn to them and say in their best Thurston Howell III voice, “Good Lord, can you possibly have a tackier candidate than Sarah Palin? I mean, really! There are limits, you know. Moose hunting? Speaking in tongues? Doesn’t read the Times? Oh, dear.”

And Krauthammer and Co.’s faces burn, and they start to hate Palin for embarrassing them in front of their rich, cultured, suave, elitist pals.

Well, they can cram it. To hell with them.

Go out and vote for Sarah. Drag McCain along with her, but elect Sarah as a big “SCREW YOU” to the Dems and the elitist conservatives who basically want you to live in a kind of cultural slavery, ruled by your “betters.”

[Harry Wurzbach]

Confound it man! Are you afraid of success?

[muawiyah]

It was demonstrated some decades back that there are men whose brains shrink as they age.

No doubt Brooks' is down to about the size of a lemon or something.

[Drill Thrawl]

David Brooks represents a “Steaming Pile” at the NYSlimes.

[Emperor Palpatine]

Just some faux-conservative Beltway pundit who thinks his low-amp brain farts are relevant.

[madameguinot]

“Who the hell is David Brooks?”

He replaced intellectual giant Anna Quindlen on the NYT editorial page.

[PGR88]

WHo is David Brooks and why should I care?

[JennysCool]

So i say, ‘What did Niebuhr mean to you?’ For the next 20 minutes, he gave me a perfect description of Reinhold Niebuhr’s thought, which is a very subtle thought process based on the idea that you have to use power while it corrupts you.

Hmm. Rather interesting coming from Obama.

[BigEdLB]

David Brooks, recently inagurated into the "Elitist Editorialist Hall of Fame", credited his courage in slamming Gov Sarah Palin to George Will, another recent inductee. "We want conservatives, you know", he said, " But we only want certain conservatives." At the mention of the word "certain" all the stuffed shirts in attendance smiled, and nodded in agreement....

[Paul Heinzman]

Sarah Palin is the second opinion oncologist that this party needs. She’ll cut out and kill the cancer.

[DB]

I believe Bill Buckley would disagree with you completely about both Palin and Obama.

If Obama is such a great intellect, where are the fruits of his brilliance?

[AmericanInTokyo]

You take flak when you are near or over the target.

[TheEaglehasLanded]

David Brooks, just another NYT writer on his way to working for Media Matters.

[toddausauras]

So bloody pretensious. “Ooh, he knows about someone that I know about and whom I reference to look smart.” Makes me want to puke. It’s about leadership not obscure pretensious referencing. He is scared along with all of his other colleagues that they won’t matter (or matter even less) if Sarah continues her rise.

[snarkytart]

"David Brook..."

Who dis?

[bigbob]

What rock did this asshat crawl out from under?

[DemonDeac]

“Sarah Palin is the ONLY reason I will be casting a vote for McCain.”

There is that Barrack fellow.