Posted on 10/08/2008 7:59:51 PM PDT by markomalley
Yes, both Todd and Sarah Palin, whom most people in the U.S. and abroad had never even heard of until six weeks ago, have emerged as powerful new symbols of a revived contemporary feminism. That the macho Todd, with his champion athleticism and working-class cred, can so amiably cradle babies and care for children is a huge step forward in American sexual symbolism.
Although nothing will sway my vote for Obama, I continue to enjoy Sarah Palin’s performance on the national stage. During her vice-presidential debate last week with Joe Biden (whose conspiratorial smiles with moderator Gwen Ifill were outrageous and condescending toward his opponent), I laughed heartily at Palin’s digs and slams and marveled at the way she slowly took over the entire event. I was sorry when it ended! But Biden wasn’t — judging by his Gore-like sighs and his slow sinking like a punctured blimp. Of course Biden won on points, but TV (a visual medium) never cares about that.
The mountain of rubbish poured out about Palin over the past month would rival Everest. What a disgrace for our jabbering army of liberal journalists and commentators, too many of whom behaved like snippy jackasses. The bourgeois conventionalism and rank snobbery of these alleged humanitarians stank up the place. As for Palin’s brutally edited interviews with Charlie Gibson and that viper, Katie Couric, don’t we all know that the best bits ended up on the cutting-room floor? Something has gone seriously wrong with Democratic ideology, which seems to have become a candied set of holier-than-thou bromides attached like tutti-frutti to a quivering green Jell-O mold of adolescent sentimentality.
And where is all that lurid sexual fantasy coming from? When I watch Sarah Palin, I don’t think sex — I think Amazon warrior! I admire her competitive spirit and her exuberant vitality, which borders on the supernormal. The question that keeps popping up for me is whether Palin, who was born in Idaho, could possibly be part Native American (as we know her husband is), which sometimes seems suggested by her strong facial contours. I have felt that same extraordinary energy and hyper-alertness billowing out from other women with Native American ancestry — including two overpowering celebrity icons with whom I have worked.
One of the most idiotic allegations batting around out there among urban media insiders is that Palin is “dumb.” Are they kidding? What level of stupidity is now par for the course in those musty circles? (The value of Ivy League degrees, like sub-prime mortgages, has certainly been plummeting. As a Yale Ph.D., I have a perfect right to my scorn.) People who can’t see how smart Palin is are trapped in their own narrow parochialism — the tedious, hackneyed forms of their upper-middle-class syntax and vocabulary.
As someone whose first seven years were spent among Italian-American immigrants (I never met an elderly person who spoke English until we moved from Endicott to rural Oxford, New York, when I was in first grade), I am very used to understanding meaning through what might seem to others to be outlandish or fractured variations on standard English. Furthermore, I have spent virtually my entire teaching career (nearly four decades) in arts colleges, where the expressiveness of highly talented students in dance, music and the visual arts takes a hundred different forms. Finally, as a lover of poetry (my last book was about that), I savor every kind of experimentation with standard English — beginning with Shakespeare, who was the greatest improviser of them all at a time when there were no grammar rules.
Many others listening to Sarah Palin at her debate went into conniptions about what they assailed as her incoherence or incompetence. But I was never in doubt about what she intended at any given moment. On the contrary, I was admiring not only her always shapely and syncopated syllables but the innate structures of her discourse — which did seem to fly by in fragments at times but are plainly ready to be filled with deeper policy knowledge, as she gains it (hopefully over the next eight years of the Obama presidencies). This is a tremendously talented politician whose moment has not yet come. That she holds views completely opposed to mine is irrelevant.
Even if she disappears from the scene forever after a McCain defeat, Palin will still have made an enormous and lasting contribution to feminism. As I said in my last column, Palin has made the biggest step forward in reshaping the persona of female authority since Madonna danced her dominatrix way through the shattered puritan barricades of the feminist establishment. In 1990, in a highly controversial New York Times op-ed that attacked old-guard feminist ideology, I declared that “Madonna is the future of feminism” — a prophecy that was ridiculed at the time but that turned out to be quite true. Madonna put pro-sex feminism on the international map.
But it is now 18 years later — the span of an entire generation. The instabilities and diminishments for young women raised in an increasingly shallow media environment have become all too obvious. I had grown up in a vibrant pop culture with glorious women stars of voluptuous sensuality — above all Elizabeth Taylor, sewn into that silky white slip as the vixen Manhattan call girl of “Butterfield 8.” In college, I feasted on foreign films starring sexual sophisticates like Jeanne Moreau, Anouk Aimée and Catherine Deneuve. Sex today, however, has become brittle and superficial. Except for the occasional diverting flash of Lindsay Lohan’s borrowed bosom, I see nothing whatever that is worth a second glance. Pro-sex feminism has worked itself out and, like all movements, has degenerated into clichés. And even Madonna, with her skeletal megalomania, looks like a refugee from a horror movie.
The next phase of feminism must circle back and reappropriate the ancient persona of the mother — without losing career ambition or power of assertion. Betty Friedan, who had first attacked the cult of postwar domesticity, had long warned second-wave feminists such as Gloria Steinem about the damaging exclusion of homemakers from their value system. The animus of liberal feminists toward religion must also end (I am speaking as an atheist). Feminism must reexamine all of its assumptions, including its death grip on abortion, if it wishes to survive.
The hysterical emotionalism and eruptions of amoral malice at the arrival of Sarah Palin exposed the weaknesses and limitations of current feminism. But I am convinced that Palin’s bracing mix of male and female voices, as well as her grounding in frontier grit and audacity, will prove to be a galvanizing influence on aspiring Democratic women politicians too, from the municipal level on up. Palin has shown a brand-new way of defining female ambition — without losing femininity, spontaneity or humor. She’s no pre-programmed wonk of the backstage Hillary Clinton school; she’s pugnacious and self-created, the product of no educational or political elite — which is why her outsider style has been so hard for media lemmings to comprehend. And by the way, I think Tina Fey’s witty impersonations of Palin have been fabulous. But while Fey has nailed Palin’s cadences and charm, she can’t capture the energy, which is a force of nature.
With Barney Frank as a cellmate.
She’s is voting Obama because she has the antiwar and has the misguided view that he is too! She is a self-described libertarian.
Not really surprising. Although I disagree with Paglia on many issues, I do respect her thoughts on many.
She has been a Palin defender from the beginning, against the so called elite feminists and the elite media as well.
She has written several columns on this.
I am one of her readers. She invites debate without having to ridicule or put down.
ping
I think it was meant as a laudatory comment. Not racist — just descriptive.
Camille Paglia is the real deal. She bows to nobody, and she reads nobody’s “talking points”.
Her support of the empty suit Obama is a little disappointing, though.
You’ll excuse me if I’m trying to fight fire with fire these days....
yep, yep, yep, and yep.
He looked bad, and he was even worse in the post analysis of who got what right and wrong.
Palin missed several opportunities to put ANY daylight between the Bush administration and the McCain/Palin candidacy and they had to know that was going to be a line of attack. And every politician answers the question they want to answer, but few of them openly admit it!
But Biden tried to prove his down home bonifieds talking about Home Depot and a restaurant that has been closed for ten years. He made up history in Lebanon, recreated McCain's legislative record, contradicted his Presidential candidates policy of Presidential meetings without preconditions, and followed it up by rewriting the Constitution to ex the VP out of Article II while making Article I the Executive article.
Bad night for Biden. If anyone scored it for Biden their point formula is all wrong. You SUBTRACT points for ridiculous statements.
I understand what you mean.
Camille is one of the few libs that is fun to read. Not a braindead robot.
Pray for W, Lady Palin and Our Troops
Camille Paglia is undoubtedly a very gifted writer and a far reaching thinker on the leading edge of Feminism...I love her writing though i may not always agree with her views..Her intelectualism is always bright, honest, passionate, and on the mark...Bless her Italian roots, gotta love this lady for her intellectual honesty...Now if she could just change a few things, one or two....
And thank you Mrs Dingman and Mrs Rafuse, wherever you are...
Paglia needs to reexamine her motivations. On one hand, she savages academicians who are scurrilous pseudo-intellectuals, yet at the same time she embraces the Democrat party and their grotesque and repeated failures. If anything, Paglia should be fiercely independent, rejecting both parties.
It is not Todd Palin she is admiring, for he is just a piece of Sarah Palin’s revitalized feminism. But Paglia should examine what should be a modern adage, that “when women stand up, men sit down.”
Does Paglia expect a powerful woman from a meeching, hypocritical leader of NOW, more concerned with leftist politics than womens’ rights? Or the fanatical, arrogant Hillary Clinton, who is convinced that female power is found from dominating and crushing her enemies (real and imagined)?
Condoleeza Rice is far closer, yet has sacrificed her life for her mastery. More “Vulcan” as she is thought of in Washington, than human. Not everybody can be a genius.
Enter Sarah Palin, reflections of whom can be seen in many of America’s soccer moms. A college degree and a job, but children and everything else. Fortunate indeed to be married to a Todd Palin type man. Sometimes called “supermoms”, properly, they should be known as “superwomen”.
Husband and children optional. While not neglected, they are another part of a masterful woman’s life. A woman who can camp out and fend for herself, who can shoot a moose, drive a motorcycle, deal with a harsh winter, run for governor, etc. Now that is a feminist, and why so many women look up to her—because they want to have a life something like hers, perhaps less the moose.
She can hold political opinions very different from theirs, but she is clear and honest, not like the muddy men who speak in scripted and opaque babble. They know what she is, that she is not a fake.
And what is Obama? He is nothing BUT a fake. An “ackempucky”, the southern expression meaning something like “a bunch of unknown leftovers thrown into a bowl and stirred up, often with a jelly-like consistency.”
In his case, some falafel, some poi, a broken up Chicago hot dog with the works and plenty of mustard, some red cabbage, chitterlings, and a bowl full of US Senate bean soup with extra pork and saffron.
Put it in a blender with unflavored gelatin. Add hope and change.
It would be like if Paglia and I were listening to a debate about the history of feminism and some old professor got it all wrong (openly lying or just confused) while some young professor was more stylish but said things with less authority. I might think that the older woman outscored the younger on points, but the younger won on style. Paglia would shake her head at me in wonderment that I didn't recognize just how wrong the old professor was and how they got everything backwards.
I read where Tina Fey asked for someone to please tell her when she can stop doing this “ woman.” Well, to Tina I would say...Tina Dear, this is the United States of America. No one has twisted your arm to play Sarah Palin and no one can STOP you from playing Sarah Palin and no one can MAKE you play Sarah Palin. So, if you truly do not want to do her impersonation because you disagree or dislike her then...just do it. Oh...what’s that you say? You like the fame and the money? Oh yeah, that would come first before your own convictions....I forgot!
I read where Tina Fey asked for someone to please tell her when she can stop doing this “ woman.” Well, to Tina I would say...Tina Dear, this is the United States of America. No one has twisted your arm to play Sarah Palin and no one can STOP you from playing Sarah Palin and no one can MAKE you play Sarah Palin. So, if you truly do not want to do her impersonation because you disagree or dislike her then...just do it. Oh...what’s that you say? You like the fame and the money? Oh yeah, that would come first before your own convictions....I forgot!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.