[presidio9]

That's nice, but I don't know why you felt compelled to tell ME. Perhaps you misinterpreted my earlier post??

To be honest, I never thought of you personally. I the future, I promise to always keep you in mind when I am considering if something is or is not postworthy. In return, I'm informing you that I will no longer be needing any future posts from you voicing you approval or disapproval of something that I may have posted. I'm already looking out for you. Is it a deal?

[beezdotcom]

To be honest, I never thought of you personally.

What the heck are you talking about? You posted directly to my user ID. That seems to be as personal as you can get.

I the future, I promise to always keep you in mind when I am considering if something is or is not postworthy. In return, I'm informing you that I will no longer be needing any future posts from you voicing you approval or disapproval of something that I may have posted. I'm already looking out for you. Is it a deal?

I'm going to disregard the rest of this screed as misplaced sarcasm, and not hold it against you - because it certainly wasn't warranted.

Here's my analysis and best guess, based on a rereading of the thread - you saw the interchange between 'allmendream' and myself, and mistakenly assumed we were talking about YOUR article. You then posted your 'explanatory' comment to me, which seemed like a bit out-of-context, and I reacted in a mystified manner.

That's the charitable interpretation. The other interpretation is less charitable, and involves you not realizing that posting directly to my ID would make me think that you were talking to me - but I'm not going to make THAT assumption.