Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin in Burlingame, California
Dartblog ^ | October 5, 2008 | Joe Malchow

Posted on 10/06/2008 12:43:28 PM PDT by publius1

I am freshly returned from a Sarah Palin fundraiser in Burlingame, California. Thank-you to the readers who donated in my name, both the nameless first (who, the campaign insists, is called Joann, and is my wife) and the second. I have stopped in a Palo Alto cafe to tap out an observation or two.

First? A smash, despite the many broadminded protesters outside whose homemade placards decried “Geezer & Gidget.” The original notion for northern California was to have an intimate event in the Woodside, Calif., backyard of a certain technology titan. (Not, regular readers should note, that of my own employer.) But in the event, far, far too many Silicon Valley Republicans wanted to pay $1,000 a plate to hear from Sarah Palin. I received a call last week letting me know that the high-priced event would now be held in a ballroom. And it was going to remain high-priced. Happy tidings. In conversation with various attendees, it unraveled to me that the profusion of California conservatives—who are in truth mostly libertarians—is not new; these are dormant Republican voters activated by either the simple goodness of the Governor of Alaska or the increasing feeling that the vaporous, vacant, “imperfect vessel” Barack Obama is a cipher hiding quite poisonous views.

So what played to this audience? What caused genuine applause? Well, one line, in particular: near the end of her twenty-minute speech, Sarah Palin told the audience that out on the hustings one comment from supporters has dominated, in frequency, all others: tell people about the real Barack Obama. She said this quietly, without drama. But: thunder, hoots, an ovation. It was the one real firework in her stump speech; yet from the cadence of the speech one could tell that it was not intended thus. Audiences know that standing up for one particular line in a political speech is reserved for positive lines—lines that honor someone, or declaim some principle, or express some affirmation, or promise some victory. Rarely are audiences moved to bolt from their chairs over a negative line. (They’re more likely to boo affectedly.) But Mr. Obama’s guile has created considerable resentment—so much, in fact, that even a flat recitation of his positions, with not a drought of oratorical flare, dazzles and refreshes and fires an audience.

Sarah Palin spent some time piquing the newsmedia, and thanks to a zealous tablemate who initiated them the New York Times earned decidedly unaffected boos from the Silicon Valley audience. But you understand that if the newsmedia were doing their job, it would not be enough for a political candidate merely to mention the opinions of her opponent. Some argument would be necessary. Not so, not so with Barack Obama. The free pass he has been given is felt—and felt widely. In the final analysis I suspect this will make the man’s candidacy weaker, not stronger. It leaves him vulnerable, qual piuma al vento, to a late-October truth-squad attack.

There was, otherwise, little new in the stump speech. It was the same one given yesterday in Southern California (photo above) and reported on by the Associated Press, which dribbled into its dispatch some surrogate outrage because Mrs. Palin mentioned Barack Obama’s relationship with a violent left-wing terrorist who once intrigued the bombing of the Pentagon. And portions of Mrs. Palin’s speech today were recycled from the Republican National Convention in St. Paul last month. That, at least, is a letdown: Barack Obama today had a fresh stump speech that made able parry to yesterday’s Palin event in the Los Angeles area. The McCain campaign is utterly unable to work as efficiently as that. But my sense was that few donors got that feeling: the excitation of Sarah Palin overshadowed easily any sense one might otherwise receive that the momentum is shifting away from John McCain.

And why not? The crowd of 25,000 she elicited yesterday is proof that Sarah Palin is attracting new voters. And today was further evidence of her effect: a ballroom flush with self-made men and women who, though accustomed to living the dreary life of a permanent political minority, now feel there’s someone for them, too. They see Sarah Palin as a political Ghostbuster singularly able, by dint of her background, her charm, and her cool, to suss out the spectrous Barack Obama, holding him up for everyone to see. She should, soon.

OH, BY THE BYE: The afternoon netted well in excess of $2 million.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: aar; ca2008; palin
Pretty good description of the event -- even with the funny sign, "Geezer & Gidget"
1 posted on 10/06/2008 12:43:28 PM PDT by publius1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: publius1

Thanks for the good news from Silicon Valley, the home of 200 major computer companies. I hope to hear more about the successful event.


2 posted on 10/06/2008 12:56:16 PM PDT by Falconspeed ("Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others." Robert Louis Stevenson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

I’m just curious. The McCain campaign has pulled out of Michigan because they don’t feel like it’s in play any longer, but they think they have a shot in California? Interesting, if true.


3 posted on 10/06/2008 12:56:30 PM PDT by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: murron
Let me tell you what is going to happen.

Sara is going to ride into Michigan and save the day.

I guarantee you that she can do it.

She will tell the Michigan Republican I am with you and we can do make a difference.

This gal if used correctly is the difference maker.

Sarah Palin is the contradiction that Obama can not over come with his celebrity status.

4 posted on 10/06/2008 1:13:32 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (The Difference Between Palin and Obama is Common Sense, She's GOT IT, He DOESN'T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: murron
I’m just curious. The McCain campaign has pulled out of Michigan because they don’t feel like it’s in play any longer, but they think they have a shot in California? Interesting, if true.

California is NOT in play - but it makes a great ATM for fundraising.

5 posted on 10/06/2008 1:15:18 PM PDT by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
Should have said:

She will tell the Michigan Republicans, I am with you and we can make a difference.

6 posted on 10/06/2008 1:15:38 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (The Difference Between Palin and Obama is Common Sense, She's GOT IT, He DOESN'T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: publius1

RECEIVED MY REPORT FROM MY BUDDIES IN FT. MYERS. THE PLACE WAS PACKED, THEY HAD TO CLOSE THE DOORS LEAVING MANY OUTDOORS. ONE DISTURBANCE FROM ABOUT A HALF DOZEN SKANKY LOOKING PEOPLE AND THEY WERE ESCORTED OUT. SHE DID A GREAT JOB!


7 posted on 10/06/2008 1:29:51 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (If we can reverse the ticket, we'd have a winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: murron
I’m just curious. The McCain campaign has pulled out of Michigan because they don’t feel like it’s in play any longer, but they think they have a shot in California? Interesting, if true.

Dude! She was there for the 2000 large.

8 posted on 10/06/2008 1:39:50 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: murron

They are many good Repubs in CA, but alas, CA is lost, so the only thing these CAers can do is donate, then their money gets put to good use in the battleground states...


9 posted on 10/06/2008 1:55:08 PM PDT by Fred (The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nihilism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: publius1

Are you hinting that Larry Ellison is a McCain supporter?


10 posted on 10/06/2008 2:03:20 PM PDT by BeAllYouCanBe (Until Americans love their own children more than they love Nancy Pelosi this suicide will continue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred

I wonder if I could get a bumper sticker that reads
“I’M for Geezer and Giget” Remember Giget always got her man at the end of the movie.


11 posted on 10/06/2008 2:11:51 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: publius1
at least "gezzer and gidget" is funny.....and not evil.....
12 posted on 10/06/2008 5:40:18 PM PDT by cherry ( chinese crisis: danger vs opportunity......we have opportunity!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred

its money but its also media time, face time, and most important of all, it’ll boost actual popular vote forMcPalin.


13 posted on 10/06/2008 5:42:36 PM PDT by cherry ( chinese crisis: danger vs opportunity......we have opportunity!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson