[Jeff Head]

Bill Ayers and his wife are domestic terrorists and abject American haters who to this day are unrepentant and who still indicate that they wish they had done more and will not rule out doing more violence in the future.

Their current positions of influence in education are a sickening, shameful mostrocity and a travesty.

Barack Hussein Obama has willfully linked his politival career and aspirations to individuals who declared war against their own country, our United States of America, in a time of war, and then went about violently prosecuting that war, and in any sane time would have long ago been executed for their treaasonous siding with the enemy during a time of war.

The MSM, the DNC, Obama and his campaign, and Ayers himself all play the American people for out and out fools by trying to pass this nefarious realtionship off as happenstance.

Obama is what he has studied to be, striven to be, and been schoole to be by militant anti-American marxists. He is one himself underneath a very thin shean of venier.

But all is not lost, apparently McCain plans a fiercer strategy against Obama

“We’re going to get a little tougher,” a senior Republican operative said, indicating that a fresh batch of television ads is coming. “We’ve got to question this guy’s associations. Very soon....”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27018572

THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH ABOUT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

[library user]

Bill Ayers is a superb writer. I especially like his book “Dreams From My Father.”

[cpanter]

The Times just has to hang on for another 4 weeks...

[mojito]

Our elite media is decadent and corrupt.

They are not to be trusted; everything they write is a lie.

They are allied with a Marxist; their values and operating methods are Leninist.

Their goal is to destroy this country.

[Lets Be Frank]

The NYTimes is desperately trying to preempt a McCain attack on the Ayers issue on Tuesday. Will it work? It certainly will in the media, they are already saying “see? even the Times says there isn't an issue here”

[reasonisfaith]

To the liberal media I ask: Do you ever contemplate how your neglect of objective truth can only devalue your work?

What is your first maxim? From which premise do you proceed? That of socialism?

I think your first premise is self. Therefore, you assume that anything believed by you—like the need to elect Obama, or to protest the military, or whatever—is good, and must be advanced against all opposition.

But do you not see how this method—that of making yourself a god with the power to define truth—will only end in your moral demise? And then, that which you value most will become absolutely devalued?

[freespirited]

IIRC, the Slimes also failed to mention that Michelle Obama was responsible for inviting Ayers to speak a panel with Bambi at a symposium she organized while working at U of Chicago.

Seems to me this is a material fact.

[philman_36]

How could a responsible paper fail to aggressively follow up on the questions raised by those requests, and by the documents and analysis presented by Steve Diamond?
And since they didn't doesn't that make them an irresponsible paper.

irresponsible - d: unable especially mentally or financially to bear responsibility

[anglian]

LMAO! Also From Obama campaign’s disinformation website, Fight The Smears: Barack Obama Never Organized with ACORN. http://sweetness-light.com/

[Red_Devil 232]

Looks Like McCain/Palin is starting to unload on the Obama/Ayers connction. Well at least Sarah is!

[MozarkDawg]

Up a 6 a.m. CST, made the coffee this morning, turn on Fox. I came into this discussion almost at the beginning, the host questioning a McCain supporter (don’t recall the name) and the late Ron Brown’s son Michael as the 0bama guy. They ALL talked about this article as though it did indeed portray the true nature of the relationship between 0bama and Ayres, Brown of course, pooh-poohing the whole thing. I am seriously disappointed to discover that instead of the fact of the matter, the NYT has done no more than toe the 0bama excuse line. Did Fox-boy even read the piece, then?

[mtntop3]

It has been noted on FR that the NYT author of this inoculation piece, Scott Shane, seems to have worked for the Chicago Sun Times during the 1990’s - when he would have had a very good chance of being acquainted with Obama.

[Cyropaedia]

Great article by Kurtz. The Times is trying to run interference against the McCain/Palin attacks against Obama.

[rmlew]

What do you expect? The lefist NY Times agrees with Ayer’s goal, just not his former means.

[Minn]

Life must really be difficult for Ayers these days with reporters from every MSM outlet in the country banging on his door demanding an interview.

[Minn]

It’s hilarious that the Times changed the title of the article after it was posted. Mask slipping a bit there, Pinch?

[XHogPilot]

bump

[bushfamfan]

The fundraiser at Ayer’s house is the most damning evidence. All Palin/the McCain camp need cite is that fundraiser ‘coffee’ event and let people come to the obvious conclusion. That’s a bit more than a distant relationship and shows how willing Obama was to accept the support and join in his efforts at ‘education’ to affect public policy. They just need to cite the evidence which does no good to this attempt to cover up this red flag.