Posted on 10/03/2008 4:35:11 PM PDT by SandRat
WASHINGTON, Oct. 3, 2008 With terrorists on the run and violence down, coalition forces are now also able to concentrate on areas other than the battlefield, thanks to the improvement of the Iraqi security forces, a military official said yesterday.
Al Qaeda insurgents are in disarray and attacks are down 80 percent since June of last year, U.S. Army Brig. Gen. Daniel B. Allyn, chief of staff of Multinational Corps Iraq told bloggers during a teleconference from Iraq.
The corps and our major commands have driven violence down to four-year lows and secured the Iraqi population in the process, he said.
Though officials believe the terrorist to be on the defensive, Allyn says one thing he has learned about al Qaeda, is that they are a resilient organization.
We are respectful of AQI as a threat, but we will continue to degrade their capability and prevent them from destabilizing the great progress being achieved by Iraqi security forces and coalition forces here, Allyn said.
Coalition forces have also interrupted the flow of foreign fighters and Iranian trained special group criminals into Iraq and continue to seize their financial sources.
With AQI in disarray and violence at a four year low, Allyn said coalition forces can focus on improving other areas of Iraq.
Security gains and the increased capacity of the Iraqi security forces enable us to increase focus on non-kinetic operations, Allyn said.
The general outlined three key areas of importance in this arena. One is to continue to professionalizing the Iraqi security forces. Another is to continue to focus on transitioning the Sons of Iraq local anti-terrorist groups to become employees of the government of Iraq. employees and to continue helping Iraq in securing its border.
The transition of the Sons of Iraq has been a potential area of friction for the Iraqi government, but Allyn said in fact it has been a great success story so far.
Were in the progress of transitioning the first 54,000 in Baghdad as we speak, Allyn said. We believe its the first major stride toward national reconciliation, which is going to be essential as this nation continues to develop.
Although the professionalization of Iraqi security forces remains a priority, Allyn said they are already headed in the right direction.
U.S. forces are now focused on delivering a similar growth in capacity across the rest of the partners and the Iraqi security forces through training and leader development, he explained.
Due to the efforts of coalition forces, Iraqi security forces and the Iraqi government, Allyn said, the enemys freedom of movement and their effectiveness have been reduced.
We continue to focus on preventing Iran from supplying lethal accelerants that are intended to destabilize the government and also preventing foreign fighters from crossing the boarder from Syria, he said. As we look down the road at deeper threats that face this country, enabling Iraq to secure its own boarders is essential to their long-term stability.
Since the surge began, Allyn said the offensive tempo has driven down Iraqi civilian deaths over 80 percent, which has given the civilians a sense of security.
Shops are opening up, families are going about doing what normal families do, he said.
That sense of security can be attributed to four factors, the courage of our service members serving here in Iraq, the growth in increasing capability of Iraqi security force partners, the heroic contributions of the Sons of Iraq and the growing capacity of the government of Iraq to lead towards sovereignty.
(Navy Seaman William Selby works for the New Media branch of Defense Media Activity.)
There is little new in this statement, that is actually of some concern.
The old military saying is, “If you’re not actively improving your position, you are wrong.”
This relates to the current situation in Iraq in several ways. There are several timetabled events on the horizon that can have a profound impact on Iraq operations. The most important of these are the US elections, which, depending on the outcome could mean radically different scenarios for the US forces in Iraq.
In either outcome, the US military must be able to immediately change course from what it is doing now. If McCain wins, the military will continue to have strong support from the White House, and there is also a strong likelihood of an Iran scenario with direct or indirect involvement of US forces in Iraq.
If Obama wins, the military may only have until Inauguration Day to turn over all operations in Iraq to the Iraqis and leave the country, concluding the UN authorization. Otherwise, the Democrats may try to inflict chaos and ruin on Iraq and the US military in Iraq, in an effort to salvage defeat from victory.
The second scenario, already mentioned, is the possibility of a conflict with Iran. While considerable planning has already gone into this, commanders and units at far lower levels than is typical should be administratively and logistically prepared to quickly become mobile and operational in a far more conventional conflict.
The third scenario is purely economic. If there is a major economic collapse, there could be severe logistical and operational curtailment. Many forward missions might have to be abandoned, and significant assets returned to the US in a short period of time, literally before the money runs out.
Large portions of our air, land, and sea forces may have to be mothballed, as well as major reduction in force of personnel.
So now is not the time to take their deserved rest, yet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.