Posted on 10/01/2008 4:06:00 AM PDT by equaviator
I recently read a manuscript about Gen X in the workplace, and as I did so, I was struck by how much of a transitional generation we are. Perhaps because of all the flux that has occurred (and continues to occur) in our time, we have always struggled to have a positive identity; so many of the experiences we share are negatives. In no particular order:
-3 Mile Island -AIDS -Tylenol scare -Drinking age went up from 18 to 21 -Existential self-awareness of grunge -Emo bands before them -Cobain’s suicide -Bush’s famous broken promise, “No new taxes” -Clinton’s impeachment
Even positives are often construed as negatives: -The Berlin Wall fell; communism failed -The Gulf War: military victory, social and geopolitical mess -Wall Street (“Greed is good…” Don’t expect loyalty!) -Political Correct movement… which stamped out discrimination on its face, and also gutted fearless, honest dialog -Dot com boom… and bust
And what’s the hallmark of our generation? Arguably, it’s our snarky, ironic, self-awareness-laden sense of humor. From the Church Lady to Colbert, with guest appearances by Garafalo and Spade, our humor has a dark overtone.
What does it mean? I dunno, maybe nothing. But as I was reading through the manuscript and cataloging for myself all the things that define us, I struggled… I interpreted the negative definitions to mean that we are not defined… we are so used to be neither this nor that, it only seemed fitting to then ascribe that same “neither” quality to our trends… hence language framed in the negative. Indeed, most of the major trends I could think of had us either a little ahead of the curve or a little behind it… very few had us right in the middle. I thought that the absence of a defining characteristic was maybe in our genes (remember “slacker?”), sort of like a collective egolessness.
Then I thought about Sherpas.
Like Gen X, Sherpas have long been part of incredible journeys, but they’ve always been just a step to the side, never in the limelight and never really part of the action. Defining the Sherpa who carried Sir Edmund Hillary’s pack for him up Mt. Everest would have taken the spotlight off Sir HIllary… and that might have ruined the the romance and majesty of the trek. Focus too heavily on Tonto, and the mystique of the “Lone” Ranger falls apart. I felt like maybe society on the whole needs us to be undefined. We’re the ones laying the ladders over the crevasses, scoping the paths, installing the ropes… taking over for the Boomers who were happy to establish base camp and prepping the pass for the Yers who we already know want to hit the peak.
But unlike the work of the mountaineering, Nepalese Sherpa, the infrastructure we are laying is far more subtle. And disruptive:
-Technology: We put together Web 1.0. Most of us who were in it knew full well we were pushing these technologies beyond their capacities, that the collapse was only a matter of time, but we also knew that we needed to lay the infrastructure hard and fast in order to force corporate America (the driving force of change in our society) to take notice. -Management: We have been flattening organizations for over a decade. Along with the Dot Com Boom came another important trend: flatter organizations. That era ushered in the idea of the meritocracy like none other: don’t like your job? Leave for a better one across the street. You’re the best programmer in the city? You could command salary and perks commensurate with your capabilities despite not being a management muckety-muck. -Values: We have been putting a torch to wanton commercialism since day one (though this trend seems to be becoming undone). One morning when my dad and I had breakfast in 1997, he was stunned to see me in a swag t-shirt and ripped jeans. “You should dress like the CEO,” he said. “I do,” I replied. Nice suits? Brand names? Not necessary. We had our fill when Guess and Girbaud had us wearing acid wash jeans and ballon-y cotton pants. We learned early that being a slave to fashion could make you look dumb, and we haven’t forgotten the lesson.
The analogy is not perfect, but the idea seems to fit. And as we enter roles of real responsibility, it’ll now be our job to shepherd society through radical change in the economy overall, from a capitalism as we used to know it to something more fluid, global, and (de)centralized. Something that, like us, has yet to be defined, that retains elements of what preceded it and includes elements of a future that is still taking shape.
We’re not in the old world, and we’re not yet in the new. We are very much in between, and it’s up to Gen X to lay the foundation that gets us from the former to the latter.
Come to think of it, both tickets this year feature a member of the Silent Generation (1925 - 1942) and depending how you see it, an early X’er (1961 - 1981) or perferably in my eyes, a “Generation Joneser” (1955 - 1965/66). John McCain (1936) and Joe Biden (1942) are from the Silent Generation, like my parents (Mom 1938, Dad 1937) where Barack Obama (1961) and Sarah Palin (1964) are “Jonesers.” I think when it comes to the Presidency, the “Silent Generation” is a good title, we never had one from that generation, hopefully John McCain will change that and anyways, I think McCain is the last shot they have to have a “Silent” as a President.
I’m a generation Xer.
On the subway, a common sight is twentysomethings locked into their Ipods. The women are in flip-flops and the piercing is in all the wrong places. I look at them and think “is it possible that America has produced a generation even dumber and more self-centered than the Xers?”
Baby boomer is a term used to describe a person who was born during the Post-World War II baby boom between 1946 and 1964. There IS NO “43 to 53 league of baby boomers”. The baby boom is defined as starting after the end of WWII. Those like myself who were born in the years between Pearl Harbor and the surrender of Japan are NOT baby boomers.
They are the most uneducated on a grand scale, as, I believe, they were the first generation to be publicly educated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You are dead wrong on the most uneducated bit. They were far more knowledgeable than most of generation X in many important areas such as history. They may not have boasted of so many degrees but high school graduates were more than capable of doing many of the jobs that require a college degree now.
“They were far more knowledgeable than most of generation X in many important areas such as history. They may not have boasted of so many degrees but high school graduates were more than capable of doing many of the jobs that require a college degree now.”
Zing!
I remember them from the 80’s! That is cool! If I was still near some of my old friends, I would love to dig those up!
Yeah, that’s about right, some say some body was doing something with a monkey they should not have or ate a monkey and brought AIDS into the human race.
The sherpas of this economy are anyone who actually pays net taxes and actually raises their children they spawn.
That in itself is now a minority of citizens and the fruits of this decline across the board are ample evident.
The largest taxpayers have always tended to be those at peak earning power....late 40s to mid 60s
I’ve always heard that the Baby Boom generation ended in 1964, and that Gen X started in 1965. I was born in 1965, so I’ve always assumed I was an early Gen X’er.
Have you ever heard of the game author Matt Forbeck?
“Gen-X uses the 70s and the 80s as their cultural heritage. Star Wars, Jaws, and ET were the major movies of our youth.”
We can’t forget the Atari and Dukes of Hazzard
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.