The Clintons knew that they were misusing corporate resources at the expense of the shareholders on their flights to Switzerland, Acapulco, Bill's cruises on the company's megayacht with the all-female crew, etc. And it's unlikely that Bill Clinton brought much business to the company - except for the CNN presidential polling contract, which was obviously intended to help Hillary's campaign more than InfoGROUP.
I certainly am not disagreeing with you. I was pointing out that the story did not mention any wrong doing.
If relatives of Clinton were provided free trips isn't there an income tax exposure? There is a concept of "constructive receipt" meaning if you received the equivalent of income you're required to report it. Also the company may be required to issue a 1099.
Someone should tip off IRS.