Skip to comments.
DEFENDANT’S, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATICNATIONAL COMMITTEE’S MOTION
Phil Berg's Obama Crimes web site. ^
| September 29, 2008
| Self
Posted on 09/29/2008 7:47:58 PM PDT by ncfool
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
To: Right in Wisconsin
"Apparently the federal judge is a Clinton appointee......" Cool, so is Berg!
41
posted on
09/30/2008 3:21:14 PM PDT
by
cookcounty
(I sent my money for a Pit Bull in Lipstick , and I want immediate delivery!!!)
To: happygrl
"This information could be considered sensitive and something that one might want to keep private. That's the only "3rd explanation." Maybe he isn't actually the son of Barack Obama sr. or something like that which would make his biography kind of stupid.
42
posted on
09/30/2008 3:32:01 PM PDT
by
cookcounty
(I sent my money for a Pit Bull in Lipstick , and I want immediate delivery!!!)
To: Sibre Fan
Well, I went to the link and while I can see how you’d certainly think the Illinois bar application perjury charge is somewhat shaky, I wouldn’t completely conclude that it’s been debunked.
43
posted on
10/01/2008 1:12:38 AM PDT
by
VigilantAmerican
(We will not waver, we will not tire; we will not falter, we will not fail)
To: VigilantAmerican
----------VigilantAmerican said Well, I went to the link and while I can see how youd certainly think the Illinois bar application perjury charge is somewhat shaky, I wouldnt completely conclude that its been debunked. ----------
Im curious. What part isnt debunked? Berg alleges
On the Illinois State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary Record it specifically asks for Full former name(s). Obama put None, when in fact he went by the name Barry Soetoro, and Barry Obama. It is further believed Obama has used the name Barry Dunham. Obama lied on the State government form that he signed under the penalty of perjury.
As Jeff points out at www.AmericasRight.com:
According to the Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, the "full former name(s)" field is reserved for names which have previously appeared on the Illinois Master Roll of Attorneys and is NOT meant to include any names adoption prior to obtaining a license to practice law in Illinois. [citing IARDC.org] A telephone call to the ARDC's offices confirmed that particular interpretation of the information on the commission's Web site.
In other words, the Record doesnt ask for names one might have previously held prior to seeking the Illinois Bar license.
Does this prove that Obama never lied on his bar application? No. But the only evidence that Berg cites to support his claim is no evidence at all. Which means that Berg has made an allegation that has no basis in any fact.
-------------
Yesterday, I just received an e-mail from a friend with the following links and a note saying something like see any parallels? This is, apparently, not the first time Berg has done this - that is, filed complaints without sufficient basis in fact (or, for that matter, standing).
Link 1;
Link 2 (PDF);
Link 3 (PDF)
All I can say is, well, WOW!
And, let's not forget Berg's RICO case against the Bush Administration for causing 9/11 or his case against the Supreme Court for its decision in
Gore v. Bush.
If it weren't for this type of "precedent," I might be inclined to believe that Berg actually had something that maybe he just hasn't yet disclosed to the public yet. But -- history suggests otherwise. Yes, even a broken clock is right two times a day ... unless the screw holding the hands fell off. I see a few loose screws here.
To: Sibre Fan
I’ve said all along that Berg is a whackjob with a rep for chasing windmills, and normally would be considered our enemy, but in this case the enemy of our enemy is our friend of course.
The reply from the Attorney Paperwork and Red-tape Commission of the High Poo-Bah and whatever was tentative, not conculsive. The person answering said they were unsure of exactly what the blank for “names previously used” is for, but that they were inclined to think it’s for names used as a slimy lawyer.
45
posted on
10/01/2008 1:46:23 PM PDT
by
VigilantAmerican
(We will not waver, we will not tire; we will not falter, we will not fail)
To: Kevmo
***Hes playing softball here. Usually such a motion is filed with a request for a contempt charge when the subpoenas are not honored. Have you read Berg's request for Denial of DNC's motion to dismiss, along with his recently updated complaint and restatement of his Discovery request?
Phil cannot ask for contempt charges from the Judge until after the Judge rules on Berg's Request to reject their Motion to Dismiss.
After the Judge denies their Motion to Dismiss, THEN, they will automatically be liable for contempt if they fail to comply the Judge's order.
46
posted on
10/01/2008 10:33:27 PM PDT
by
Polarik
("The Greater Evil")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson