Well, I went to the link and while I can see how you’d certainly think the Illinois bar application perjury charge is somewhat shaky, I wouldn’t completely conclude that it’s been debunked.
----------VigilantAmerican said Well, I went to the link and while I can see how youd certainly think the Illinois bar application perjury charge is somewhat shaky, I wouldnt completely conclude that its been debunked. ----------
Im curious. What part isnt debunked? Berg alleges
On the Illinois State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary Record it specifically asks for Full former name(s). Obama put None, when in fact he went by the name Barry Soetoro, and Barry Obama. It is further believed Obama has used the name Barry Dunham. Obama lied on the State government form that he signed under the penalty of perjury.
As Jeff points out at www.AmericasRight.com:
According to the Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, the "full former name(s)" field is reserved for names which have previously appeared on the Illinois Master Roll of Attorneys and is NOT meant to include any names adoption prior to obtaining a license to practice law in Illinois. [citing IARDC.org] A telephone call to the ARDC's offices confirmed that particular interpretation of the information on the commission's Web site.
In other words, the Record doesnt ask for names one might have previously held prior to seeking the Illinois Bar license.
Does this prove that Obama never lied on his bar application? No. But the only evidence that Berg cites to support his claim is no evidence at all. Which means that Berg has made an allegation that has no basis in any fact.
-------------
Yesterday, I just received an e-mail from a friend with the following links and a note saying something like see any parallels? This is, apparently, not the first time Berg has done this - that is, filed complaints without sufficient basis in fact (or, for that matter, standing).
Link 1;
Link 2 (PDF);
Link 3 (PDF)
All I can say is, well, WOW!
And, let's not forget Berg's RICO case against the Bush Administration for causing 9/11 or his case against the Supreme Court for its decision in
Gore v. Bush.
If it weren't for this type of "precedent," I might be inclined to believe that Berg actually had something that maybe he just hasn't yet disclosed to the public yet. But -- history suggests otherwise. Yes, even a broken clock is right two times a day ... unless the screw holding the hands fell off. I see a few loose screws here.