Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gondring
On the Dem side, you have, "well, the GOP might get blamed overall, but in my district, I'll get creamed if I vote for this piece of thievery!" and "There's not enough pork in this...I'm not going to vote for it until it's fattened up again!" etc.

And, even if I do vote against it, the media will cover my back:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/business/30cong.html?hp

Representative Roy Blunt of Missouri, the Republican whip, said that before the vote he had tallied 75 votes in his conference in favor of the plan. By the time the votes were cast, the Republicans could deliver only 65 of them.

Republicans said they had alerted Democrats they might not have the numbers required. But they never recommended the legislation be put off and in the end they were unable to win any last-second converts to change the votes that would have been necessary to turn defeat into victory.

96 posted on 09/29/2008 7:52:04 PM PDT by Libertarian444
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Libertarian444
Doesn't this headline (just screen captured now) seem odd?



Is it old?

What am I missing?

97 posted on 09/29/2008 8:01:55 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson