More! more!
Looks like it’s starting to leak out everywhere now. Good.
Now the word needs to get out that ACORN caused this mess, and that Obama was a liar for hire for ACORN.
>”These are taxpayer funds, in an indirect method, being used to subsidize political activism,” says Rep. Jeb Hensarling, a Texas Republican and chairman of the conservative House Republican Study Committee. “I’m sure they’re not going out and registering any Republicans.”
si.
Senator Hides His Sweet Deals When Will He Release Records?
Mentions that LA grand jury....
ACORN, if they get funded through this f#cking bailout, are going to be the equivalent of the brown shirts of the Nazis, and like South Africa’s communist ANC party thugs. They will turn into hit squads.
Barry will just tell them to get in your face.
After hearing that Paulson, and his operatives, emailed the House Republicans plan to Obama’s camp (according to Rush), I am wondering if Paulson (a known Democrat) did not conjure this whole mess as a political ploy to insure Obama’s election! Even if Paulson was not responsible for the leak of the Republican plan, he is still a Democrat, and as such taxpayers should still be highly suspicious.
The timing of this so called “crisis” is just too opportunistic for Democrats. I do think they have been surprised by the public outcry over their thievery (via the potential funds for ACORN, La Raza, & Urban League). I think they thought this would just sail past everyone like their institutionalized thievery has done in the past.
Activist Groups Fraud and Dishonest Practices Further Cemented by Cover-Up Scheme
7/9/08, WASHINGTON Tim Miller, Communications Director of the Employment Policies Institute, issued the following statement after The New York Times published an explosive exposé this morning detailing how the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) covered up nearly $1 million in embezzled funds by its founders brother:
It comes as no surprise that ACORN founder and chief organizer Wade Rathke hid his brothers embezzlement of nearly $1 million dollars from the charitable organizations employees, board of directors, and donors. This is just one more page in ACORNs corrupt history, which already includes election fraud investigations in at least a dozen states, hypocritical and oppressive employment practices, and a political agenda driven by a handful of anti-corporate activists.
This shameful embezzlement scheme and the eight year cover-up ought to make supporters and donors wary of associating themselves with ACORN. Its bad enough that the boss brother stole almost a million dollars, but for Wade Rathke to sweep the crime under the rug and keep his brother on ACORNs payroll is a disgrace.
More information about ACORN’s long history of corruption can be found in the Employment Policies Institute’s recent report “Rotten ACORN: America’s Bad Seed” — available online at www.RottenACORN.com
This is LONG but worth the read (there is more at the link below). Talk about a weave of political corruption done in the name of ‘charity’.
NONE of these people care about the ‘working poor’. They care about THEMSELVES and MORE POWER & MONEY.
******
Now comes the Tides Foundation and its recent offshoot, the Tides Center, creating a new model for grantmaking — one that strains the boundaries of U.S. tax law in the pursuit of its leftist, activist goals.
Set up in 1976 by California activist Drummond Pike, Tides does two things better than any other foundation or charity in the U.S. today: it routinely obscures the sources of its tax-exempt millions, and makes it difficult (if not impossible) to discern how the funds are actually being used.
In practice, Tides behaves less like a philanthropy than a money-laundering enterprise (apologies to Procter & Gamble), taking money from other foundations and spending it as the donor requires. Called donor-advised giving, this pass-through funding vehicle provides public-relations insulation for the moneys original donors. By using Tides to funnel its capital, a large public charity can indirectly fund a project with which it would prefer not to be directly identified in public. Drummond Pike has reinforced this view, telling The Chronicle of Philanthropy: Anonymity is very important to most of the people we work with.
Where the Money Comes From
The Tides Foundation is quickly becoming the 800-pound gorilla of radical activist funding, and this couldnt happen without a nine-figure balance sheet. Just about every big name in the world of public grantmaking lists Tides as a major recipient. Anyone who has heard the closing moments of a National Public Radio news broadcast is familiar with these names. In 1999 alone, Tides took in an astounding $42.9 million. It gave out $31.1 million in grants that year, and applied the rest to a balance sheet whose bottom line is over $120 million. Since 1996, one foundation alone (the Pew Charitable Trusts) has poured over $40 million into Tides. And at least 17 others have made grants to Tides in excess of $100,000.
The Tides Center: A Legal Spin-Off
The Tides Center board of directors has been especially busy of late. In 2001 the first Tides franchise office (not counting Tides presence in Washington and New York) was opened in Pittsburgh. This new outpost, called the Tides Center of Western Pennsylvania, was erected largely at the urging of Pittsburgh native Teresa Heinz (the widow of Senator John Heinz, the ketchup heir). Heinz pulls more strings in the foundation world than almost any other old-money socialite; shes presently married to U.S. Senator John Kerry (D-MA). The Tides Foundation has collaborated on funding projects with the Heinz Endowments (Teresa Heinzs personal domain) for over 10 years.
Fenton Communications, itself a touchstone for radical political campaigns, made use of the Tides Center to set up its Environmental Media Services (EMS) in 1994 (it has also since emerged from under Tides protection and formally set up shop in Fentons offices). The fact that Tides originally ran EMS day-to-day operations provided PR spinmeister David Fenton with plausible deniability — a ready-made alibi against charges that this supposedly nonpartisan media outfit was just a shill for his paying clients. Now, of course, we all know that it is just that.
Similar stories can be told about SeaWeb, the Environmental Working Group, the National Environmental Trust (formerly known as the Environmental Information Center) and the Center for a Sustainable Economy, each of which received millions while under the Tides umbrella. Besides having been incubated in this fashion, the other principal commonality among these organizations is a client relationship with Fenton Communications.
The depth and financial implications of the Tides/Fenton connection is truly impressive, if not surprising. After all, long-time Fenton partner and recently-departed Environmental Media Services chief Arlie Schardt has sat on the board of the Tides Center/Tides Foundation complex since the very beginning. At present, the Fenton Communications client list includes at least 36 Tides grantees, as well as 10 big-money foundations that use Tides as a pass-through funding vehicle just about every year. In some cases, the Tides Foundation has been used to funnel money from one Fenton client to another.
Tides also maintains an interesting relationship with the multi-billion-dollar Pew Charitable Trusts. Since 1993 Pew has used the Tides Foundation and/or Tides Center to manage three high-profile journalism initiatives: the Pew Center for Excellence in Journalism, the Pew Center for Civic Journalism, and the Pew Center for the People and the Press. These Pew Centers are set up as for-profit media companies, which means that Pew (as a private foundation) is legally prohibited from funding them directly. Tides has no such hurdle, so it has gladly raked in over $95 million from Pew since 1990 — taking the standard 8 percent as pure profit.
In practice, the social reformers at the helm of the Pew Charitable Trusts use these media entities to run public opinion polling; to indoctrinate young reporters in reporting techniques that are consistent with Pews social goals; and to promote (read: subsidize) actual reporting and story preparation that meets Pews definition of civic journalism. Civic journalism, by the way, is defined as reporting that mobilizes Americans behind issues that Pew considers important.
Thumbing Their Noses At America
Among the most unbelievable projects of the Tides Center is something called the Institute for Global Communications (www.igc.org). IGC is a clearinghouse for Leftist propagandists of all stripes, including living-wage advocates, anti-war protesters, slave-reparations hucksters, and a wide variety of extreme environmentalists. In February 2002 Orange County Register columnist Steven Greenhut called it a network of the loony left that has to be seen to be believed One alert posted in an IGC member conference calls for financial support for the Earth Liberation Front Another message warns readers against cooperating with the FBI.
The Chronicle of Philanthropy has documented this sort of America-bashing before. In a November 15, 2001 story, the Chronicle reported that the Tides Center had given the Independent Media Center (IMC) $376,000 — ironically, from its 9/11 fund. IMC is a notorious bastion of far left, radical viewpoints, and also serves as an organizing outpost for all sorts of large-scale protest activity. In particular, the IMC served as a virtual staging ground prior to the April 20, 2002 anti-war protests in Washington, DC. Visitors to the IMC web site can read the rantings of black bloc anarchists, violent animal-rights criminals, and an assortment of anti-American advocates, all brought to you by the Tides Center and its tax exemption.
Skirting the Tax Law
The Tides Foundation and Tides Center continue to build their activist war chest by exacting an 8 to 9 percent handling fee on funds that pass through on their way to other activists. Some monies are awarded as grants in the traditional fashion (according to donor-advised agreements). Its impossible to know for sure whose money is being spent for which of these grants. Other funds go toward management services to existing activist organizations in return for a percentage of their gross revenues. In still other examples, the Tides Center offers financial and administrative support for start-up advocacy groups.
In this last case, the Tides Center offers a sort of blanket tax-exempt designation for its grantees and projects. The entire foundation (pun intended) on which the Tides Center is built depends on the notion that the law allows one tax-exempt group to lend its exemption to another organization.
The legality of this proposition has never been challenged in court, but Tides practice of allowing smaller groups to share piggyback tax-exempt status could make its own 501(c)(3) status vulnerable.
* When Ben & Jerrys announced that profits from its popular Rainforest Crunch ice cream flavor were earmarked for save-the-earth charities, the mass media swooned. What they didnt tell you was that 20% of the cut went directly to the Tides Foundation.
* Back in 1985, Drummond Pike and two colleagues started the Working Assets Funding Service, a for-profit company whose family of credit-card, mutual fund, and long-distance telephone services have grown into a $130 million business. Working Assets lures consumers (over 400,000 so far) with promises of socially responsible commerce. A two-percent cut of the profits go to activist causes — funneled, of course, through the Tides Foundation.
**Democrats want to use profits from the bailout as a slush fund for liberal activist groups, even those involved in vote fraud to help elect Barack Obama. **
NNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Imagine this crap? My forefathers are rolling in their graves.