Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Warlord
What got me confused was, in posts 87, 96, 103 I thought we were talking about a real naked short, as opposed to a virtual "naked short" which was a byproduct of issuing a derivative.

Could you please go into more detail as to the kind of naked short you are referring to?

155 posted on 09/28/2008 9:18:12 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625
From my understanding a “naked short” is borrowing a stock that one does not own and immediately selling the stock, thus leaving one with a “naked” short position on the stock. It's very possible that people use this term to mean different things. Either form of the transaction, however, is legitimate in and of itself, although, of course, open to abuse in various circumstances.
157 posted on 09/28/2008 9:23:33 AM PDT by Warlord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson