To: Warlord
What got me confused was, in posts 87, 96, 103 I thought we were talking about a real
naked short, as opposed to a virtual "naked short" which was a byproduct of issuing a derivative.
Could you please go into more detail as to the kind of naked short you are referring to?
155 posted on
09/28/2008 9:18:12 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
To: PapaBear3625
From my understanding a “naked short” is borrowing a stock that one does not own and immediately selling the stock, thus leaving one with a “naked” short position on the stock. It's very possible that people use this term to mean different things. Either form of the transaction, however, is legitimate in and of itself, although, of course, open to abuse in various circumstances.
157 posted on
09/28/2008 9:23:33 AM PDT by
Warlord
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson