Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625
From my understanding a “naked short” is borrowing a stock that one does not own and immediately selling the stock, thus leaving one with a “naked” short position on the stock. It's very possible that people use this term to mean different things. Either form of the transaction, however, is legitimate in and of itself, although, of course, open to abuse in various circumstances.
157 posted on 09/28/2008 9:23:33 AM PDT by Warlord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: Warlord
From my understanding a “naked short” is borrowing a stock that one does not own and immediately selling the stock, thus leaving one with a “naked” short position on the stock.

Ok, now I understand how we got off the rails. You are describing a regular short sale, where the seller borrows the shares he is selling. A "naked short" is where you sell shares that you plain do not have, and potentially may not be able to cover.

162 posted on 09/28/2008 10:23:46 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson