To: PapaBear3625
From my understanding a “naked short” is borrowing a stock that one does not own and immediately selling the stock, thus leaving one with a “naked” short position on the stock. It's very possible that people use this term to mean different things. Either form of the transaction, however, is legitimate in and of itself, although, of course, open to abuse in various circumstances.
157 posted on
09/28/2008 9:23:33 AM PDT by
Warlord
To: Warlord
From my understanding a naked short is borrowing a stock that one does not own and immediately selling the stock, thus leaving one with a naked short position on the stock. Ok, now I understand how we got off the rails. You are describing a regular short sale, where the seller borrows the shares he is selling. A "naked short" is where you sell shares that you plain do not have, and potentially may not be able to cover.
162 posted on
09/28/2008 10:23:46 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson