Replies

As much as I liked it, I have to say that his comments along the lines of ‘genocide’ (implied) of Mexican fetuses was a little over the top.

I thought he said "Hispanic," not "Mexican" specifically. Margaret Sanger was a racist, and many left-wing elites, despite being "mulitcultural," despise these little "colored" people having lots and lots of babies. It's funny, since there are some on the Right who think the same way.

As much as I liked it, I have to say that his comments along the lines of ‘genocide’ (implied) of Mexican fetuses was a little over the top.

I thought he said "Hispanic," not "Mexican" specifically. Margaret Sanger was a racist, and many left-wing elites, despite being "mulitcultural," despise these little "colored" people having lots and lots of babies. It's funny, since there are some on the Right who think the same way.

Not to be too confrontational over it, because I believe we agree with a lot of our views, I believe the words in question are more or less interchangable here. If he did say Hispanic, I didn't mean to misquote him. I read the article and didn't remember the precise word he used. The point is, dead fetuses are the issue here. Intentional focused genocide takes the issue off target. If he wants to berate the people who have abortions for depriving 'the race' with as many representatives as it could have had, I think that is an appropriate point. Trying to blame these abortions on someone other than the people who are volunteering, even paying to have them, is unfortunate.

When he mentions racists, I think he is talking about folks who object to our nation being inundated by a massive inflow of people who are violation of our laws governing immigration. You did mention a leftist racist. I don't deny their existence, but I don't think those are higly visible enough that he ignored the illegal immigration activists to key on them. I do agree with you that there are leftist racists. It does bother me that you mention the right wing racists, because that is not what we're talking about here. He's not referencing the KKK or some such. He's talking about the Minutement IMO. This side issue of who the racists are is precisely the point I was trying to make. It takes us off target.

I appreciate your response.