Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CatOwner

Ouch is right! But Rasmusssen polls at Dems 39% and Reps 33%. The 2004 presidential election had a turnout of Dems 37% and Reps 37%.


6 posted on 09/26/2008 6:32:39 AM PDT by avacado (Obama's response to a crisis: "Call me if you need me...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: avacado

It is all about turnout, turnout, turnout, and nothing more. Which side is more motivated to go to the polls.

Our side *is* motivated. The whole point of the MSM effort over the next 5 weeks is to try to beat down that resolve. Don’t let the bastards do it!


56 posted on 09/26/2008 6:51:34 AM PDT by 6SJ7 (Welcome PUMAs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: avacado
I made the point yesterday, and have been for a short while, that Rasmussen's state and National Party ID expected turnout breakdown is just too heavily favoring Democrats.

He has openly swayed from his traditional models this election season, and I think it's going to hurt his credibility.

He has a rather large - near six point - Democrat turnout edge figured in to his national polls, and is apparently doing the same in his state polls - assuming larger Dem-to-GOP turnout gaps than have presented themselves in the past few elections.

His assumption just doesn't seem plausible. For example, if the turnout was 5-6 percent more Dems, there would be no swing states - they'd all be blue. It is starting to reveal itself in his polls.

96 posted on 09/26/2008 7:39:14 AM PDT by TitansAFC (In 2008, please vote GOP and show us that you love your country more than you hate John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson