Posted on 09/25/2008 5:24:53 AM PDT by SJackson
Iranian Research Center: Saudi Arabia Seeks to Topple Iranian Regime
An article published by Iran Diplomacy, [1] an international relations and foreign policy research center headed by former Iranian ambassador to France (2002-2005) Mohammad Sadegh Kharrazi (brother of Iranian Foreign Relations Steering Council head Kamal Kharrazi [2] ), accused Saudi Arabia of seeking to topple the Iranian regime and to attain regional hegemony. The article also accused Saudi Arabia of suppressing its Shi'ite minority, "for whom Iran is a source of inspiration," and warned about the possibility of an intra-Muslim war in the region.
Following are excerpts from the article, in the original English:
"Military strike on Iran is a hot topic these days, but everybody knows that in case of an attack on Irans military sites or nuclear facilities by the United States or Israel, the region will become a fireball, headed towards total destruction. The closest country to the site of the clash will be Iraq, and the bullets will set the whole country on fire.
"This war will influence Iraq's international status more than its domestic affairs. It will have an impact on the presence of American troops in Iraq, and it will prompt the re-emergence of some Iraqi groups that are looking for any opportunity to attract the attention of the United States and the Arab countries. These groups are ready to enter a war with Iran
"There are radical groups in the region that are trying to spark off a conflagration. If necessary, they are ready to spend their oil revenues and to shower arms traders with money, in order to reach their goal.
"There are also others who are fetish about war. They depend on war for their livelihood and believe that others should be sacrificed so that they survive. They will do anything they can to start the war - and they know well how to go about it.
"Look at Bandar bin Sultan..."
"Look at Bandar bin Sultan, for example. These days, he frequents Russia and, by signing multi-billion dollar military contracts with it, is trying to stop their support for Iran and to bring Russia to the pro-war camp. We can say that the Saudis have replaced Saddam Hussein and are trying to trigger regional war in every possible way, just like the executed Iraqi president...
"The Saudis are now trying to draw Iran into a new crisis, in order to reach two major goals: first, to stop their Shi'ite population and other minorities from gaining power - since Iran is a source of inspiration for these groups; and second, to pave the way for a change of regime in Iran by undermining the Islamic Republic. The Saudis want rulers in Iran and Iraq who will give them no cause for concern.
"There are still other advantages in this for Saudi Arabia. If Teheran becomes weak, the Saudis will become the first power in the region, and, by wielding their accumulated oil dollars, they can expand their domination over the Middle East. But meanwhile, the Egyptians, who are never happy with Irans policies and who have frictions with Teheran, are extremely worried about a possible war in the region. This, during his meeting with Sa'ud Al-Faisal, Egyptian FM Ahmad Aboulgheit stated that he saw no prospect of a war with Iran. Aboulgheit thought wisely, since any war against another Muslim country would engage other Muslim countries..."
[1] Iran Diplomacy (Iran), 1.8.2008.
[2] A body established in 2006 by the Iranian Supreme Leader 'Ali Khamenei. For more information about this committee see MEMRI Inquiry and Analysis Series No. 283, "Power Struggle in Iran - Part III: Iran Establishes New Foreign Relations Steering Council," June 29, 2006.
A two front war!
Brilliant!
High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]
----------------------------
This might be a jihad I could love!
No love lost between Persians and Arabs.
Earth to Iran-——you are surrounded. Throw down your gun and put your hands up.
this is very bad news
the brave IRGC might better stoke their islamist nationalist rage by striking the Saudi oil fields than conducting a suicide mission against Israel
I believe a crude oil price of $60-65/bbl is ideal for several reasons. First, it screws Iran and Russia big time, crashing their one-trick economies. Second, it still provides large profits for our moderate Gulf allies without excess play money to export Islamic troublemaking. And third, it is high enough to make domestic exploration and drilling profitable here in the USA. If if weren't for the third point, the ideal price could go even lower -- but domestic drilling is absolutely vital.
How do we crush our enemies? Crash the price of oil!
I suspect that’s one of the reasons we have ships with anti-missile capabilities deployed in the region. I don’t think the Saudi assets are in that much danger.
I suspect that’s one of the reasons we have ships with anti-missile capabilities deployed in the region. I don’t think the Saudi assets are in that much danger.
Look
I don’t have any evidence, but it would not surprise me in fact if the “Saudi regime” is trying to remove the regime now in place in Iran.
It would not surprise me if, behind the scenes, the Saudis are the biggest secret backers, diplomatically, for Israel or the U.S. to take out Iran’s nuke program.
In fact, if all that were true (which it may or may not be) then much of U.S. “intelligence” other than electronic (all the humint on Iran) may in fact be MOSTLY derived from Saudi intelligence, “passed” to us.
If THAT is true, then I think we, and Israel too, need to wait a bit.
It seems to me that the U.S. has been conned more than once already into being the true defense forces for the Saudis, on the premise “we are protecting the oil”.
The Saudis are NOT “moderates”.
The contest for “supremacy” in the region while appearing to be between the “Saudis” and “Iran”, is simply that they are just the current icons and leading figures in the ancient, an eternally ongoing contest between Sunni and Shia.
Guess what folks, the west does not have a dog in that race. The Wahabi and the Mullahs in Iran are equally dangerous to the west. Their feud does not change the Muslim political ambitions they both have - domination of us.
What would be best for the west IS NOT to pick a side in that contest, let it increase, let them have at it, let them consume each other.
Nor would I, they're the only remaining sovereign threat to the Saudis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.