Skip to comments.
Father of the internet: 'web is running out of addresses'
Times Online ^
| Sept 24, 2008
| Mike Harvey
Posted on 09/24/2008 10:04:00 AM PDT by rjsimmon
The world is about to run out of the internet addresses that allow computers to identify each other and communicate, the man who invented the system has told The Times.
Vint Cerf, the father of the internet and one of the worlds leading computer scientists, said that businesses and consumers needed to act now to switch to the next generation of net addresses. Unless preparations were made now, he said, some computers might not be able to go online and the connectivity of the internet might be damaged.
(Excerpt) Read more at technology.timesonline.co.uk ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: arpanet; internet; ipv4; ipv6
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Time to implement IPv6.
1
posted on
09/24/2008 10:04:01 AM PDT
by
rjsimmon
To: rjsimmon
2
posted on
09/24/2008 10:05:32 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
To: rjsimmon
If we take all IP addresses away from Nigeria and take addresses away from all spam sources, we’ll be fine til 2310.
To: rjsimmon
if they would switch to alpha-numeric they could keep the current XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX format
i am sure 999billion addresses seemed like a lot when it was invented
4
posted on
09/24/2008 10:08:06 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
To: rjsimmon; ShadowAce
Time to implement IPv6. You know, people are just going to continue being lazy and using NAT.
5
posted on
09/24/2008 10:08:14 AM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
(No, no se puede, Juan! No to bailouts, no to amnesty, no to carbon credits, no to Big Government!)
To: rjsimmon
6
posted on
09/24/2008 10:08:38 AM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: George from New England; tx_eggman
Sure glad I still have that school bus buried with supplies from 1998-99 timeframe... now... where are those keys?
7
posted on
09/24/2008 10:08:39 AM PDT
by
SpinnerWebb
(Islam ... If you can't join them, beat them.)
To: Vaquero
To: rjsimmon
Oh good. Another ‘crisis’ over which the ninnies in the MSM can go nuts.
9
posted on
09/24/2008 10:10:25 AM PDT
by
6SJ7
(Welcome PUMAs!)
To: George from New England
> If we take all IP addresses away from Nigeria and take addresses away from all spam sources, well be fine til 2310.
Not a silly idea at all, for a whole bunch of reasons. I wonder why they don’t?
10
posted on
09/24/2008 10:10:29 AM PDT
by
DieHard the Hunter
(Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fà g am bealach.)
To: rjsimmon
What’s the rush? The more scarce IPv4 addresses get, the more providers can charge for them. What’s their incentive? Why do you think they’ve been sitting on their hands with IPv6 for a decade now?
11
posted on
09/24/2008 10:11:01 AM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: rjsimmon
...and then airplanes start falling out of the sky, right ???
12
posted on
09/24/2008 10:12:57 AM PDT
by
Mark319
(Obama/Biden...The liberals are going for the throat...)
To: rjsimmon
'web is running out of addresses' Small nit: Its the current internet version that is running out of internet addresses. The "web" is just fine with its URL "addresses".
13
posted on
09/24/2008 10:13:13 AM PDT
by
C210N
(The television has mounted the most serious assault on Republicanism since Das Kapital.)
To: rjsimmon
He said he had been speaking to ISPs, including AT&T and Verizon in the United States and BT, the biggest ISP in the UK. He said the bulk of companies had no idea about IPv6 and the ISPs were not informing them. They didn't know about IPv6 ? Who are these companies employing as network engineers ? Actually, what is more likely is that the upper echelons were probably informed by the engineers, but the bean counters considered it too costly and ignored them.
To: rjsimmon
Time to implement IPv6. Most Windows and Linux systems have a good IPv6 stack running right now. The missing ingredients are in the core routers and off the shelf networking gear that is IPv4 only. My home network is mostly functional with IPv6, but that is principally just for entertainment. DoD mandated IPv6 in new procurements, but failed to enforce it. It's an unrealistic demand when vendors are delivering the necessary infrastructure.
15
posted on
09/24/2008 10:14:07 AM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: rjsimmon
Problem Solved
16
posted on
09/24/2008 10:18:10 AM PDT
by
New Perspective
(Proud father of a 4 year old son with Down Syndrome)
To: Myrddin
It's an unrealistic demand when vendors are NOT delivering the necessary infrastructure.
17
posted on
09/24/2008 10:20:57 AM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: rjsimmon
Agreed, sheesh. IPv6, move along...
18
posted on
09/24/2008 10:24:54 AM PDT
by
bigbob
To: rjsimmon
If you want to move to IPv6 .... start charging more money per /24 address. This will create a huge jump in price for those that hold full class A addresses (IBM owns the 9 network) who will then either move to IPv6 or implement NAT and reduce their foot print.
To: rjsimmon
20
posted on
09/24/2008 10:30:49 AM PDT
by
maggief
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson