Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Join the BOYCOTT Against Hallmark for its ‘Gay Wedding’ Cards
Family Policy Network ^ | 9/23/08 | Family Policy Network

Posted on 09/23/2008 4:42:50 AM PDT by TheAverageGuy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
I just signed the petition to boycott Hallmark. We've GOT to take a stand against their efforts to undermine family values on behalf of our children!
1 posted on 09/23/2008 4:42:50 AM PDT by TheAverageGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

thanks for the heads up


2 posted on 09/23/2008 4:47:09 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

ditto


3 posted on 09/23/2008 4:47:49 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

I was already boycotting Hallmark for giving donations to anti-RKBA organizations. Thanks for giving me another reason! Now maybe I can get my MIL to stop buying their cards.


4 posted on 09/23/2008 4:51:44 AM PDT by gieriscm (07 FFL / 02 SOT - www.extremefirepower.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy
No.

I have no problem with civil unions.

5 posted on 09/23/2008 4:53:37 AM PDT by KeepUSfree (WOSD = fascism pure and simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

I won’t boycott because I believe that the company has a right to sell their product, whether or not I agree with it’s message.


6 posted on 09/23/2008 4:54:42 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy; Cagey; Larry Lucido; MotleyGirl70

Gay wedding cards will be as commercially successful as was the Urban Sombrero.


7 posted on 09/23/2008 4:57:18 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

I agree. Lest we forget, that’s what makes us the USA the USA. I am not forced to buy the product in question.
But I won’t boycott them because I do not agree with something. I hate the “I must be right” mentality on both sides of the aisle.


8 posted on 09/23/2008 4:57:50 AM PDT by donnab (some people use change to promote their careers...others use their careers to promote change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

I’m strongly against the redefinition of marriage too...I think its a disastrous step for our culture to take, but I don’t believe in boycotting businesses either. Hallmark are not “endorsing” homosexual marriage. They are just responding to a gap in the market. Our job is to prove there shouldnt BE such a gap.


9 posted on 09/23/2008 5:00:54 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

Businesses do not force behavior on us - no boycott. I may instead boycott California and Massachusetts.


10 posted on 09/23/2008 5:02:41 AM PDT by jimfree (Dems beat up girls who don't toe the line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donnab

That’s part of the fun of FR...lots of people like that.

Seriously though, I think that’s one of the reasons our country is so divided...the internet has made it very easy for people that are ‘right’ to join together and drown out those that will admit that there may be other views.


11 posted on 09/23/2008 5:02:41 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

In a bad economy things like greeting cards are one of the first items to get cast aside, nice job narrowing your markets dillweeds.


12 posted on 09/23/2008 5:03:04 AM PDT by Camel Joe (liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donnab

Well I sure as hell will boycott them.

I don’t understand that reasoning at all.

So if they want to make a card for pedophiles[not that they would right now] or polygamists, thats ok? What the heck...all kinds of room under the big tent. I don’t have to buy THAT one.

Doesn’t work for me but whatever floats your boat.


13 posted on 09/23/2008 5:05:44 AM PDT by Adder (typical basicly decent bitter white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

Hallmark had a large store two blocks away from the WTC- it was in business for over 20 years.

It closed its doors last year due to less customers in the downtown area since 9/11.


14 posted on 09/23/2008 5:09:35 AM PDT by Canedawg (Show me an old Liberal and I'll show you someone with no brains. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

Fine, no boycott. Instead, how about a “I will never ever take my hard earned dollars to that business again” stand? I haven’t done business with Hallmark for years. As with others, this just gives me another reason not to in the future.


15 posted on 09/23/2008 5:10:11 AM PDT by itsthejourney (Sarah-cuda IS the right reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

Meh. Whatever, they’re selling a card to an extremely small segment, if they want to print them WTF do I care.

Hallmark is NOT the reason gay “marriage” exists. What a waste of electrons.


16 posted on 09/23/2008 5:11:07 AM PDT by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy
My boycott will consist of not buying the gay cards. The rest I will continue to buy.

If Hallmark thinks there is a market for this, more power to them.

17 posted on 09/23/2008 5:12:06 AM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

I am now boycotting McDonald’s and Hallmark. Yes, they have a right to sell what they want, and I have a right not to buy it. In spite of what the popular media tells us, homosexual behavior is a destructive lifestyle. It destroys lives and relationships and contributes to the deterioration of our culture.

As a Christian, I am called to love all men including homosexuals. I count several of them among my friends and acquaintances. I want the best for them and that is why I do not endorse or encourage their self-destructive behavior.


18 posted on 09/23/2008 5:20:01 AM PDT by Drawsing (The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

I think they’d make a card for fascist dictators if they thought there was a market for it (Congratulations! You’ve just committed your FIRST genocidal act!)

Banning these cards is not going to stop homosexuals “marrying”. Being convinced of the sinfulness of their lifestyle and allowing their lives to be changed right around is going to stop that. So, if you think homosexual “marriage” is wrong, what do you think you should be doing?

Let me put it like this: If someone insists on saying and doing something that you are sure is wrong, you basically have two choices. You can either out-argue them, or you can shut them up. I know its very tempting to simply “shut them up”. You are very convinced they are in the wrong and are doing harm not only to themselves but to all that you hold dear (as indeed they are). Besides “shutting them up” is SO very much easier to do. And of course, the opposition tries to shut US up all the time.

Lovingly bringing those, who after all are made in Gods image, to a personal knowledge of their sinfulness and their need to rethink their entire lives, in the teeth of what can be vicious opposition, is a hard, thankless task that can take years. Decades even. But IMHO that is what God calls us to do.

You put out fires with water, not fires of your own.


19 posted on 09/23/2008 5:22:30 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: American_Centurion

halmark is playing into the “normalization.”

what next:

congratulations on you first crime?
congratulations on the jury finding you not guility?
congratulations on [insert something about farm animals]?
congratulations on cheating on your husband/wife?
congratulations on writing a tasteles SNL skit?

there is a limit and a company should pay the price for it.


20 posted on 09/23/2008 5:24:23 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson