Wasington Post Cartoon Mocks Sarah Palin's Faith

Washington Post ^

[februus]

The asinine Oliphant - phew!

[usshadley]

F the Left

[smith288]

Does Palin really have that big a boobs? Thats the real question...

[Always Right]

G-damn America. The chickens are coming home to roost. Jesus was a poor black child.

[wk4bush2004]

As a Christian who speaks in tongues, I find this cartoon extremely offensive!!! Have the liberals completely lost their minds? Or did they have any, in the first place?

Where is the respect for others?

[txzman]

Let’s hope Christians wake up and vote like Christians, not like the sheeple they usually act like.

[VeniVidiVici]

I thought Oliphant died?

[queenkathy]

http://snipurl.com/3sf5a [ag_org]
Here is the official Assembly of God reaction. As a member of the Assemblies I take offense also. Can’t remember how many members we have now but I’m sure this stuff will be remembered in the voting booth.

It only motivates the base more.

[Fresh Wind]

The Washington Compost lives up to its name once again.

[Senator Goldwater]

Does Palin really have that big a boobs? Thats the real question...

---

I have the answer.

[Proud2BeRight]

The libs continue to show the nation their depravity.

[sageb1]

Appalling.

[mylife]

Posted on a Sunday no less!

[stevem]

Have the liberals completely lost their minds? Or did they have any, in the first place?

These must be trick questions!

[dascallie]

Assemblies of God response (excerpt)

“The cartoon is despicable,” states AG General Superintendent George O. Wood. “Millions of Christians today follow the example of first century Christians who prayed in other tongues. The Washington Post would not think of printing a cartoon that mocked members of the Muslim or Jewish faiths. It should be ashamed. Furthermore, Sarah Palin has to my knowledge never said she prays in other tongues.

[BamaDi]

Disgusting!

[StolarStorm]

Can one type in tongues?

bargg splaatttt dooba dooba.

[Grampa Dave]

NOW, NOW, NOW...THERE GOES OLIPHANT, AGAIN.

[rudy45]

Didn’t Paul say that he preferred prophesying over speaking in tongues (I Cor)? Also, if someone speaks in tongues, isn’t someone supposed to interpret? And if there’s no interpreter, the one speaking in tongues is supposed to shut up? Otherwise, as Paul said, someone will come into the church, hear everyone speaking in tongues, and will conclude that they’re crazy lol.