[reaganaut1]

A blogger demonstrates that the ad is true at http://radgeek.com/gt/2008/08/28/the_real/ . Obama agrees with the NYT editorial board 100% on abortion, but the Times wants to suppress that information so that he can gain power and enact their common agenda.

Of course, the Senator who has worked hardest to silence independent groups at election time is John McCain. Ugh.

By discussing the alleged "smears" the Times may encourage some readers to learn the truth about Obama's positions, helping McCain.

[library user]

To the drive-by media, if you tell the truth about Obama, you’re lying and if you lie about Palin what you say is fact.

[Jim Robinson]

"The group aims to block federal regulations so it can spend unlimited money on a commercial smearing the Democratic nominee as a zealous proponent of any and all abortion on demand — “at any time during pregnancy, as many times as a woman wants one.”

Smearing? Since when is the absolute truth smearing?

[cpanter]

He’s nuanced. They are liars - And underhanded too.

Typical op-ed.

[6SJ7]

In truth, it trashes the candidate’s nuanced position (on abortion).

Killing a child after it's born. This is an interesting definition of nuanced.

[Mark]

NY Times does not own a copy of our Constitution.

[Bishop_Malachi]

It even employs an Obama-like voice pledging to make taxpayers pay for abortions, help minors conceal abortions from their parents, and legalize late-term abortions.

It's hard to believe that the Times has their thong in a wad over this. Everything they are saying about Obama is true. He holds an abortion position that is as-radical-as-they-come.

[Unam Sanctam]

How horrible, citizens exercising their first amendment rights! Mustn’t have that... Issue advocacy should never have been brought within the scope of the campaign finance laws.

[Cheerio]

To spread these lies

WTF? These are not lies, and are backed up by Obama's own words and actions in the IL Senate.

[yongin]

The NY Slimes sure knows about smears esp. when about Palin.

[bahblahbah]

“”””

Posing as a mere “issue advocacy” operation, the group’s ad attacks Mr. Obama’s character and accuses him of “lying” about his abortion record. In truth, it trashes the candidate’s nuanced position. It even employs an Obama-like voice pledging to make taxpayers pay for abortions, help minors conceal abortions from their parents, and legalize late-term abortions.
“””””

That’s his record...

[goldstategop]

The MSM, they can dish it out but their candidate can't take it. So they want his critics silenced. It says a lot about their commitment to First Amendment free speech rights that the New York Times is behaving like Obama's thugs.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[Cicero]

I thought the NY Times supported Obama because he supports unlimited abortion. So, why are they complaining? Isn’t that what they want?

[unspun]

IMHO, the biggest reason that McCain's poliing (and approval) numbers have gone down is not "the economy, stupid."

It is Obama and the Obamedia getting away with his lie of calling McCain's Sex Ed chrge a "lie."

It is the perception sold by tham that McCain has gotten "sleazy" (while it is Obama who is).

[oblomov]

>>...attacks Mr. Obama’s character and accuses him of “lying” about his abortion record. In truth, it trashes the candidate’s nuanced position.

And now this...after all of his schlepping around to consult with numerous journalists, propaganda experts, and trial lawyers on crafting just the right nuance on when and how it is virtuous to kill babies.

[chris_bdba]

You would be surprised at how many peple around here in SE Ohio already know about how extreme Obama is on it. This does not sit very well with white working class males at all!

[highpockets]

How can you Swift Boat a candidate who did not serve?

Obama hates the military, wants soldiers to die in defeat, and lacks the courage to serve.

How can he be Swift Boated?

Oh I get it.

When John Kerry did his little salute, in an attempt at using his disgraceful military conduct as qualification to be CIC, any investigation of that service was unfair.

So in response to valid inquires about his leadership, the MSM now defines honest research concerning DNC candidates as Swift Boating.

A military designation of equipment and operations has once again been twisted by partisan media pundits. The same MSM has been attacking the military for decades.

I will now refer to all Vietnam War Protesters as Poll Pot accomplices, genocide advocates, cowards, and deferment junkies.

[cookcounty]

"The group aims to block federal regulations so it can spend unlimited money on a commercial smearing the Democratic nominee as a zealous proponent of any and all abortion on demand — “at any time during pregnancy, as many times as a woman wants one.”

Exactly which demanded abortion has Obama opposed????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Is the NYT that ignorant? ...........Or are they just that dishonest?

[rockinqsranch]

“.....a commercial smearing the Democratic nominee as a zealous proponent of any and all abortion on demand....”

Since when is telling the truth “SMEARING”? What Thesaurus is the NYT using?

[wac3rd]

The NYT is garbage and serves as a pasta dinner for the starving liberal wanting his fill of Obama and the goodness of Marxism.

It is a joke and so biased, it makes me scream.

8 pages of Palin smear; front page news on fake Duke Lacrosse rape; no news of Channon Christian...

They are a Communist rag.

[XR7]

Nuanced

Myass.