Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Danae
Here's my concern -- US government buys the bad debt from the banks (that's actually morally correct since CRA forced the banks to give mortgages to winos in the first place).

Eventually govt ends up actually owning a lot of the mortgaged properties.

Obama, Sharpton, etc. eventually DEMAND that the govt let poor people live in these empty properties. Entire communities turned into crap.
3 posted on 09/18/2008 8:30:55 PM PDT by atomicweeder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: atomicweeder

deadbeats live in them anyway.


5 posted on 09/18/2008 8:41:18 PM PDT by omega4179 ("John McCain has not... talked about... My muslim faith")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: atomicweeder

They should just pay them off and be done with it rather than “buy” into anything else or create a new program - if they do anything. It’s not a good idea in any event because if businesses get the idea the government is just going to bail them out there is less and less reason for them to be careful and thoughtful in their business decisions. I don’t like this at all.


8 posted on 09/18/2008 8:43:38 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: atomicweeder

I don’t like the looks of this. A lot of people are going to end up with free homes or get ridiculously low re-finance terms from the federal government. In essence, all of us taxpayers will be paying for deadbeats to stay in their home and keep it. You just know the libs are going to try and forgive these debts.


10 posted on 09/18/2008 8:47:04 PM PDT by Azzurri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: atomicweeder

“Eventually govt ends up actually owning a lot of the mortgaged properties.”

HUD was America’s biggest slumlord 30 years ago. Let’s go back to giving loans to people with good credit.


14 posted on 09/18/2008 8:59:21 PM PDT by popdonnelly (I'll tell you a little secret: we're smarter and more competent than the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: atomicweeder

that is sorta part of this plan if the Dems get their way

folks with bad mortgages get to keep their homes and we as tax payers assume the difference between the original and what they can actually afford

ain’t America great?

I doubt Mac will fight this with 47 days to go

this issue scares me in the final weeks with the media carring the water too


19 posted on 09/18/2008 9:14:26 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: atomicweeder

If they’re going to liquidate these properties at a loss anyway, why not just let the owners stay and reduce their debt service? This could help prevent a lot of properties (and neighborhoods) from going to hell. We’re going to pick up the tab anyway.


25 posted on 09/18/2008 9:29:48 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: atomicweeder

I hear ya! You are right one, and those communities continue to allow themselves be manipulated by these “people”, the DNC leadership. Its Astounding.


29 posted on 09/18/2008 9:39:58 PM PDT by Danae (Read my Lipstick: I AM Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: atomicweeder
Or the government does what the banks would/should have been doing with them...Auction them off.
53 posted on 09/19/2008 3:07:23 AM PDT by EBH ( ... the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness. --Alculin c.735-804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: atomicweeder
...actually morally correct since CRA forced the banks to give mortgages to winos ..

That's a very minor part of this whole mess. What's more, everyone knows it.

What about the flippers?

What about the speculators who purchased blocks of condos pre-construction to resell after the development was completed?

What about middle-class families that could afford a townhouse but instead got a McMansion with easy money?

What about the families who took out second mortgage on their inflated-equity to put in a pool and a jacuzzi?

Not to mention all the bankers who looked the other way, the appraisers who inflated their assessments, the financial analysts who put in super-optimistic assumptions in valuation models.

84 posted on 09/19/2008 8:57:04 AM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson