Posted on 09/18/2008 4:26:27 PM PDT by mattdono
Or somebody at the ‘Rat nest that is Yahoo just looked it up and gave it to the Obama campaign.
/johnny
I got my yahoo password hacked and changed last year. It took two weeks of emails and phone calls to authenticate myself to them, and to enable me to restore my usage.
Something doesn’t smell right here at all.
Joe Democrat: This isn’t like Watergate! It’s a witchhunt! Like the Lewinsky scandal...cause it’s all about sex...cause Palin’s sexy.
People have been requesting her E-mails for a while now.
10 Sep 2008. Washington Post
"From the case law, if government voluntarily opens up that internal decision-making to what I would call civilians, then that is waiver of that protection of the government policy decision-making process. That is what happened here, and it happened because Sarah Palin doesn't understand it," he said.
Well, that’s a good technical explanation.
Would running that script be consider “hacking” or “cracking”?
As Kerry says “Whut we needs is a huntin license fer Demo-rats” ......
As Kerry says “Whut we needs is a huntin license fer Demo-rats” ......
I’m not sure that is right. I thought Yahoo email was exclusively Web, and didn’t offer an SMTP interface.
What I don’t understand is why the Secret Service/FBI/men in black didn’t have that email and all others she and her family might have used under strict security.
Yes, I read the post.
It’s not the same question. That story talks about doing the password reset.
I was asking how they knew the precise address.
I wasn’t aware of the Washington Post piece that published her email address.
/johnny
Shoot, at this juncture the Russians or the Iranians (or both) might be using their own spy networks to feed information to Democrat nutcases looking to bring down the McCain candidacy. They’ve both got plenty to lose if he wins.
It was suggested that the group Anonymous was involved in this hacking. IF that is true they are group that is desiring to change/ attack groups or individuals that they see as a threat to thier world view. They are apposed to scientology and have made a direct threat against them:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=84TE5Uh4Z4E
They are supposed to be a non-partisan group but if the group has a social agenda (anti-Scientology is an aspect) then a short jump to political ideology in support of that ideology is not a stretch. If they saw that the republican veep nominee was a threat they would do the same to her as it is believed they did to Scientology computers. There is some debate on the hacking circuit what really happened and who did the initial hack but the effect is the same her private information is splattered across the Internet. the final outcome is still to be determined.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.