[noob4palin]

So what he is saying is that any human being who is a financial burden to society should die. So any fetus of a mother who does not have the financial means to provide for her baby should be aborted.

[WayneS]

I THINK that is what he is saying.

The logical conclusion of his “plan” would sure lead to a reduction in demand for government subsidized housing, wouldn’t it?

[Raider Sam]

Why dont they go a step further and say anyone alive who is a burden on society should be “adult aborted?” I could see that going over REAL well (sarc).

I have always wanted to ask a pro-abort if they think it would have been a good idea for their mother to participate in this practice.

[MrB]

That’s exactly what their ideology tells them.

And it stems from the rejection of the Creator and the Christian worldview.

A human, in the “evolutionary” worldview, is an animal walking upright, that’s alive for 70 yrs, and doesn’t exist before or after. He seeks to accumulate as much power and stuff to himself during those 70 yrs as possible, and pass on his genes. He has no worth to the transcendent society except for what he provides to it minus what he takes from it.

A human in the Christian worldview is an eternal being created in God’s image. He transcends all societies and material existance. He has inherent worth as God’s creation. His purpose while alive is to glorify God with that life.

[Netizen]

So what he is saying is that any human being who is a financial burden to society should die. So any fetus of a mother who does not have the financial means to provide for her baby should be aborted.

Don't give them any ideas.